From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.andi.de1.cc (mail.andi.de1.cc [178.238.236.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7F2430CD9E; Sun, 6 Sep 2026 08:19:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.238.236.174 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788682766; cv=none; b=rwTWmvVCyASDdpxG/mSWJM63UIEue7a3Z2JUWgXYp+RHrVZ/FNrdtP9vMVP9voxaDNF2PkWLZUqEJW7yCrfLxIyYKH9jbR0g0BvJe94QdGDgE5Sf3bvD8yjN0/SPGvRs5DKwwJfhZ3W8IGqKYO5FhVi3toPuDQus0tir00zf0Lw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788682766; c=relaxed/simple; bh=L5srEMJP1B5M0FdrqGNhOEFicz2UgHY3O0TahFjuZNE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nNSqKwks7cPTF/mYWT7y/bzx2yIt+gRtAMjbNQDJI5GrQGLenn0XEvI7Yt6SEly1N03Os3/tf8eXUC48e1NLcpkJ0AHqoFSAWxS4odFHg2agFII+sOUoelj+Yt72y49zdZ5Q0D4Ay0Lbki8jkTTkRy521WrVpogrmzMH9TAtZBE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kemnade.info; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kemnade.info; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.b=wo6/G8dN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.238.236.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kemnade.info Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kemnade.info Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.b="wo6/G8dN" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kemnade.info; s=20220719; h=References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=qVqBaro4u6j4vDM7zRBqf26XGAFIlsvWCm284+Ot/Vs=; t=1788682764; x=1789892364; b=wo6/G8dNlvO19ndW8r5EKUPJU55fREq9XbZnwqmi2UI5H9VtIpSoTd4YB45Eh65kTjGHfh5OPOs 1xGZoCDHEmEyLss3xDq0fzrpmgw4e9SAxyM+gVPRBY1VXwPk8Pp8e1sN5FP57ZjX65nW25ihHJRip 1j7Je0Q2O0Lkp276MmHhDQisv7mZMuPykCFrBd1mO/32x6L54pb5lqbiE0+fWJ8IHLsJCOmJdDdfV S5iurhY0IRFxWpLqbOh1/mg57KJ9aRulrTP0+s1/+dapHaVjZTSlWHOci7Nmph/YJeKaDrahZQk0m lFnav5vk7UAQnd16UeLzpUyMF+QHRM7BIS6g==; Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2026 10:19:10 +0200 From: Andreas Kemnade To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Karl Mehltretter , Jonathan Corbet , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Dmitry Torokhov , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan , Randy Dunlap , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, Steve Wahl , Dimitri Sivanich , Mike Travis , Tony Luck , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , Arnd Bergmann , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Tony Lindgren , Kevin Hilman , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Dominik Brodowski , Damien Le Moal , Niklas Cassel , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Ethan Nelson-Moore , Michael Schmitz Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] docs: kernel-parameters: Drop the edac_report= entry Message-ID: <20260906101910.588d055e@kemnade.info> In-Reply-To: <20260905185037.GDapxkfbPNUxJgaMH8@fat_crate.local> References: <20260905094649.41996-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com> <20260905094649.41996-4-kmehltretter@gmail.com> <20260905151345.GAapwxqT93wPWHF7u4@fat_crate.local> <20260905153336.GBapw2UFa7Sdc0ve_A@fat_crate.local> <871pb7zn36.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <20260905162742.GCapxC_ra7hJd27LDR@fat_crate.local> <20260905194720.7033b956@kemnade.info> <20260905185037.GDapxkfbPNUxJgaMH8@fat_crate.local> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.49; aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 11:50:37 -0700 Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2026 at 07:47:20PM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > > That's for "not getting any answers" which is not the case here. > > No, that's the case ALWAYS. If you spam maintainers with too often > submissions, you end up achieving the opposite to what you're trying to do. > This particular set was sent too fast, I agree, but reading that document again, it sounds like the summary is being patient with busy people. Some subsystems even discourage waiting in such cases: e.g. https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html "Do not wait too long (weeks) between postings either as it will make it harder for reviewers to recall all the context." [...] > > But if the main maintainers (which is a bit harder to say in this series) found > > time to review, than IMHO (also seen from my maintainer perspective), improve > > as soon as you find time and submit the improved version. > > If you want an earlier submission, feel free to ask the person. > > In the general case, though, one should do a good testing before submitting > and all the issues caught after that, one can work in in her/his next version > locally and perhaps even state so. > Hmm, maybe I was misunderstood. Just to avoid that I accidentially provoke patch-flooding with my comments: The next revision should come only after you have finished your homework (improve according to review comments, tests,...) and any further review comments are unlikely. Regards, Andreas