linux-edac.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	x86@kernel.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, mchehab@kernel.org,
	mikhail.jin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [v4,15/16] driver/edac: enable Hygon support to AMD64 EDAC driver
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:26:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e17958a-6cd8-4c6c-c890-f5f48b084d6f@redhat.com> (raw)

On 21/08/2018 13:20, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 07:04:23PM +0800, Pu Wen wrote:
>> Sure, JV will negotiate with AMD and make sure only JV use family 18h and
>> AMD won't use family 0x18h, which will make the patch tight and clear.
>>
>> What's the best way to adapt for EDAC driver?
>> * To simplify the code based on AMD won't do family 0x18 and remove
>>   vendor checking.
> 
> That, provided AMD won't use family 0x18.
> 

But then I don't see the point of adding the Hygon vendor, since any
check can be simplified:

	(AMD || HYGON) -->
		AMD

	(AMD && fam = 17h) || (HYGON && fam = 18h) -->
		AMD && (fam = 17h || fam = 18h)

	(AMD && fam = 17h) || HYGON -->
		AMD && (fam = 17h || fam = 18h)

etc.  Anyway, I don't care much either way.

Paolo

             reply	other threads:[~2018-08-21 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-21 11:26 Paolo Bonzini [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-08-23  8:27 [v4,15/16] driver/edac: enable Hygon support to AMD64 EDAC driver Borislav Petkov
2018-08-22 13:18 Pu Wen
2018-08-22 13:07 Pu Wen
2018-08-21 18:07 Pavel Machek
2018-08-21 13:04 Borislav Petkov
2018-08-21 11:20 Borislav Petkov
2018-08-21 11:04 Pu Wen
2018-08-21  8:13 Borislav Petkov
2018-08-19 16:14 Pu Wen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6e17958a-6cd8-4c6c-c890-f5f48b084d6f@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=mikhail.jin@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=puwen@hygon.cn \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).