From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2B2C43461 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:50:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197CD206B5 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:50:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727944AbgIQPuc (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:50:32 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0226.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.226]:58732 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728200AbgIQPsn (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:48:43 -0400 Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by smtpgrave01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB7D1813B78B; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AFD182CED28; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:28:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-HE-Tag: shock03_2c15c0f27123 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1891 Received: from XPS-9350.home (unknown [47.151.133.149]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <707865b7ccc9168177940cd4f63cf7cb9ead2d63.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] EDAC/mc_sysfs: Add missing newlines when printing {max,dimm}_location From: Joe Perches To: Xiongfeng Wang , Borislav Petkov Cc: mchehab@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:28:12 -0700 In-Reply-To: <591e613e-0b53-028f-08fd-3d62a35b8c4f@huawei.com> References: <1600051734-8993-1-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> <20200916170052.GO2643@zn.tnic> <591e613e-0b53-028f-08fd-3d62a35b8c4f@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 19:38 +0800, Xiongfeng Wang wrote: > On 2020/9/17 1:00, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:48:54AM +0800, Xiongfeng Wang wrote: > > > @@ -813,15 +817,21 @@ static ssize_t mci_max_location_show(struct device *dev, > > > char *data) > > > { > > > struct mem_ctl_info *mci = to_mci(dev); > > > - int i; > > > + int i, n; > > > char *p = data; > > > + unsigned int len = PAGE_SIZE; > > > > > > for (i = 0; i < mci->n_layers; i++) { > > > - p += sprintf(p, "%s %d ", > > > + n = snprintf(p, len, "%s %d ", > > > edac_layer_name[mci->layers[i].type], > > > mci->layers[i].size - 1); > > > + p += n; > > > + len -= n; > > > > What happens if that subtraction causes len to wrap around and become a > > huge positive unsigned integer? If you're really concerned about wrapping, use scnprintf.