From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7A8534DCCD; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 19:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789500629; cv=none; b=Sv5rYkTtJWGkJfSAC/IIkFRAdNbHvEh3CAONNQAEisySosPt6ZmnqpR4RaiUtmnnN3lkx9p2tZWk2qiWvD2tp7GMvcEAJw7LG0dC8N0D8w/T39YnOyqqbHC2e9S8IxDetOS6Vxjz4mVgDbET7AjpAmmfUMcUKThcJ9rHSXoFD7Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789500629; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4cWMkRG+Z1pJ1YvFzmDZQGESqd6Z0JZYG5q1O4QBX8Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=foNXPkTrKo65XxXYRnLMmHDdN52uc92S1nS4HPivj0VmT1aAP1l3oW0bJKJ6JAJMkR8qevrtePFiY0OwJB+miOgQATfVX1FhSbBZJKubKsy+l7Rd7s0+1Z1pPBeEHIUo7ukdZUazo4YEL0m5EWznamL0Xw36wNWBZXvlHraR6yw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=EyruoRl0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="EyruoRl0" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net F2F804090B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1789500627; bh=29SVqZL6jaoTFFeLQLoNThpgj0piqyLyfTAK7yqpIug=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=EyruoRl03OfhKEEodVxwuVKlMcA1THLACkOdReZNBhjYyEMWe8UWtqgwlrVKQ2k9V Ac2wHtWfbrINS9koY1N4SZTqQXNLjPcm8+WWvLTvbvXKbZiPq94Kq1RdBsZ3UZxEWH gY6qbEulSvkhaEVGgaQDsJIcf0SLqUCT5V0ckBIZwrZkJFRgdrWFjLEipPIGI3MESj B+Fej+BB6f6olcWAeq2fqV/BH82wmq0s34MbcxzQa8g9mmoo4qnh0fZb5BYbv+XWUf YAD/K/bi4rd/pDdBltIgre8enU1G6eTTDX2ha194FzcTMIVrBeB90RwqZvfv281JIv JBKi/MnvmsaSg== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:814::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2F804090B; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 19:30:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Karl Mehltretter , Tony Luck , Borislav Petkov Cc: Karl Mehltretter , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan , Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: RAS: Use the real EDAC PCI parity control names In-Reply-To: <20260905092441.41401-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com> References: <20260905092441.41401-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 13:30:26 -0600 Message-ID: <874ifq8g8d.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Karl Mehltretter writes: > The document names the sysfs control > /sys/devices/system/edac/pci/check_pci_parity and the module parameter > edac_panic_on_pci_pe. Neither exists. > > check_pci_parity was renamed to check_pci_errors by commit 91b99041c1d5 > ("drivers/edac: updated PCI monitoring"), after the document had been > written. > > The module parameter has been edac_pci_panic_on_pe > (drivers/edac/edac_pci_sysfs.c) since it was introduced, and the > document described it as edac_panic_on_pci_pe from the start. > > Use the real names. > > Fixes: 91b99041c1d5 ("drivers/edac: updated PCI monitoring") > Fixes: 327dafb1c61c ("edac: core fix redundant sysfs controls to parameters") > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/RAS/main.rst | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. jon