linux-edac.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [v2,5/7] x86: plumb error code and fault address through to fault handlers
@ 2018-08-27 18:56 Jann Horn
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jann Horn @ 2018-08-27 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kees Cook, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, x86, Andy Lutomirski,
	kernel-hardening, Tony Luck, Borislav Petkov, jannh
  Cc: linux-kernel, dvyukov, linux-edac

This is preparation for looking at trap number and fault address in the
handlers for uaccess errors.
This patch should not change any behavior.

Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/extable.h   |  3 ++-
 arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h    |  2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c          |  6 ++---
 arch/x86/mm/extable.c            | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c              |  2 +-
 6 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable.h
index f9c3a5d502f4..d8c2198d543b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable.h
@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ struct pt_regs;
 		(b)->handler = (tmp).handler - (delta);		\
 	} while (0)
 
-extern int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr);
+extern int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr,
+			   unsigned long error_code, unsigned long fault_addr);
 extern int fixup_bug(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr);
 extern bool ex_has_fault_handler(unsigned long ip);
 extern void early_fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h
index 6de1fd3d0097..6c68d4947a8f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -37,8 +37,10 @@ struct pt_regs {
 	unsigned short __esh;
 	unsigned short fs;
 	unsigned short __fsh;
+/* On interrupt, gs and __gsh store the vector number. */
 	unsigned short gs;
 	unsigned short __gsh;
+/* On interrupt, this is the error code. */
 	unsigned long orig_ax;
 	unsigned long ip;
 	unsigned short cs;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index 4b767284b7f5..e822d706d8c8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -1347,7 +1347,7 @@ void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 		local_irq_disable();
 		ist_end_non_atomic();
 	} else {
-		if (!fixup_exception(regs, X86_TRAP_MC))
+		if (!fixup_exception(regs, X86_TRAP_MC, error_code, 0))
 			mce_panic("Failed kernel mode recovery", &m, NULL);
 	}
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index bf9ab1aaa175..16c95cb90496 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ do_trap_no_signal(struct task_struct *tsk, int trapnr, char *str,
 	}
 
 	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
-		if (fixup_exception(regs, trapnr))
+		if (fixup_exception(regs, trapnr, error_code, 0))
 			return 0;
 
 		tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ do_general_protection(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 
 	tsk = current;
 	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
-		if (fixup_exception(regs, X86_TRAP_GP))
+		if (fixup_exception(regs, X86_TRAP_GP, error_code, 0))
 			return;
 
 		tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ static void math_error(struct pt_regs *regs, int error_code, int trapnr)
 	cond_local_irq_enable(regs);
 
 	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
-		if (fixup_exception(regs, trapnr))
+		if (fixup_exception(regs, trapnr, error_code, 0))
 			return;
 
 		task->thread.error_code = error_code;
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
index 0b8b5d889eec..4110cca93a08 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 #include <asm/kdebug.h>
 
 typedef bool (*ex_handler_t)(const struct exception_table_entry *,
-			    struct pt_regs *, int);
+			    struct pt_regs *, int, unsigned long);
 
 static inline unsigned long
 ex_fixup_addr(const struct exception_table_entry *x)
@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ ex_fixup_handler(const struct exception_table_entry *x)
 }
 
 __visible bool ex_handler_default(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
-				  struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
+				  struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr,
+				  unsigned long fault_addr)
 {
 	regs->ip = ex_fixup_addr(fixup);
 	return true;
@@ -30,7 +31,8 @@ __visible bool ex_handler_default(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ex_handler_default);
 
 __visible bool ex_handler_fault(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
-				struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
+				struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr,
+				unsigned long fault_addr)
 {
 	regs->ip = ex_fixup_addr(fixup);
 	regs->ax = trapnr;
@@ -43,7 +45,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ex_handler_fault);
  * result of a refcount inc/dec/add/sub.
  */
 __visible bool ex_handler_refcount(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
-				   struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
+				   struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr,
+				   unsigned long fault_addr)
 {
 	/* First unconditionally saturate the refcount. */
 	*(int *)regs->cx = INT_MIN / 2;
@@ -96,7 +99,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ex_handler_refcount);
  * out all the FPU registers) if we can't restore from the task's FPU state.
  */
 __visible bool ex_handler_fprestore(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
-				    struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
+				    struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr,
+				    unsigned long fault_addr)
 {
 	regs->ip = ex_fixup_addr(fixup);
 
@@ -109,7 +113,8 @@ __visible bool ex_handler_fprestore(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ex_handler_fprestore);
 
 __visible bool ex_handler_uaccess(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
-				  struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
+				  struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr,
+				  unsigned long fault_addr)
 {
 	regs->ip = ex_fixup_addr(fixup);
 	return true;
@@ -117,7 +122,8 @@ __visible bool ex_handler_uaccess(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ex_handler_uaccess);
 
 __visible bool ex_handler_ext(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
-			      struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
+			      struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr,
+			      unsigned long fault_addr)
 {
 	/* Special hack for uaccess_err */
 	current->thread.uaccess_err = 1;
@@ -127,7 +133,8 @@ __visible bool ex_handler_ext(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ex_handler_ext);
 
 __visible bool ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
-				       struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
+				       struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr,
+				       unsigned long fault_addr)
 {
 	if (pr_warn_once("unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x%x at rIP: 0x%lx (%pF)\n",
 			 (unsigned int)regs->cx, regs->ip, (void *)regs->ip))
@@ -142,7 +149,8 @@ __visible bool ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe);
 
 __visible bool ex_handler_wrmsr_unsafe(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
-				       struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
+				       struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr,
+				       unsigned long fault_addr)
 {
 	if (pr_warn_once("unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x%x (tried to write 0x%08x%08x) at rIP: 0x%lx (%pF)\n",
 			 (unsigned int)regs->cx, (unsigned int)regs->dx,
@@ -156,12 +164,13 @@ __visible bool ex_handler_wrmsr_unsafe(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ex_handler_wrmsr_unsafe);
 
 __visible bool ex_handler_clear_fs(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
-				   struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
+				   struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr,
+				   unsigned long fault_addr)
 {
 	if (static_cpu_has(X86_BUG_NULL_SEG))
 		asm volatile ("mov %0, %%fs" : : "rm" (__USER_DS));
 	asm volatile ("mov %0, %%fs" : : "rm" (0));
-	return ex_handler_default(fixup, regs, trapnr);
+	return ex_handler_default(fixup, regs, trapnr, fault_addr);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ex_handler_clear_fs);
 
@@ -178,7 +187,8 @@ __visible bool ex_has_fault_handler(unsigned long ip)
 	return handler == ex_handler_fault;
 }
 
-int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
+int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr, unsigned long error_code,
+		    unsigned long fault_addr)
 {
 	const struct exception_table_entry *e;
 	ex_handler_t handler;
@@ -202,7 +212,7 @@ int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
 		return 0;
 
 	handler = ex_fixup_handler(e);
-	return handler(e, regs, trapnr);
+	return handler(e, regs, trapnr, fault_addr);
 }
 
 extern unsigned int early_recursion_flag;
@@ -238,9 +248,9 @@ void __init early_fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
 	 * result in a hard-to-debug panic.
 	 *
 	 * Keep in mind that not all vectors actually get here.  Early
-	 * fage faults, for example, are special.
+	 * page faults, for example, are special.
 	 */
-	if (fixup_exception(regs, trapnr))
+	if (fixup_exception(regs, trapnr, regs->orig_ax, 0))
 		return;
 
 	if (fixup_bug(regs, trapnr))
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 2254a30533b9..60f1678dc3d7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 	int sig;
 
 	/* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? */
-	if (fixup_exception(regs, X86_TRAP_PF)) {
+	if (fixup_exception(regs, X86_TRAP_PF, error_code, address)) {
 		/*
 		 * Any interrupt that takes a fault gets the fixup. This makes
 		 * the below recursive fault logic only apply to a faults from

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [v2,5/7] x86: plumb error code and fault address through to fault handlers
@ 2018-08-27 19:08 Andy Lutomirski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy Lutomirski @ 2018-08-27 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jann Horn
  Cc: Kees Cook, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, X86 ML, Andy Lutomirski,
	Kernel Hardening, Tony Luck, Borislav Petkov, LKML, Dmitry Vyukov,
	linux-edac

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> wrote:
> This is preparation for looking at trap number and fault address in the
> handlers for uaccess errors.
> This patch should not change any behavior.

Confused.  $SUBJECT says you're plumbing the error code through, and
you are sort of doing it:

> -int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
> +int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr, unsigned long error_code,
> +                   unsigned long fault_addr)
>  {

It's available here...

>         const struct exception_table_entry *e;
>         ex_handler_t handler;
> @@ -202,7 +212,7 @@ int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
>                 return 0;
>
>         handler = ex_fixup_handler(e);
> -       return handler(e, regs, trapnr);
> +       return handler(e, regs, trapnr, fault_addr);

... but you don't pass it into the handlers.  Is this intentional?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [v2,5/7] x86: plumb error code and fault address through to fault handlers
@ 2018-08-27 19:25 Jann Horn
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jann Horn @ 2018-08-27 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Lutomirski
  Cc: Kees Cook, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, the arch/x86 maintainers,
	Kernel Hardening, tony.luck, Borislav Petkov, kernel list,
	Dmitry Vyukov, linux-edac

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 9:09 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> wrote:
> > This is preparation for looking at trap number and fault address in the
> > handlers for uaccess errors.
> > This patch should not change any behavior.
>
> Confused.  $SUBJECT says you're plumbing the error code through, and
> you are sort of doing it:
>
> > -int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
> > +int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr, unsigned long error_code,
> > +                   unsigned long fault_addr)
> >  {
>
> It's available here...
>
> >         const struct exception_table_entry *e;
> >         ex_handler_t handler;
> > @@ -202,7 +212,7 @@ int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
> >                 return 0;
> >
> >         handler = ex_fixup_handler(e);
> > -       return handler(e, regs, trapnr);
> > +       return handler(e, regs, trapnr, fault_addr);
>
> ... but you don't pass it into the handlers.  Is this intentional?

Whoops. No, that's not intentional. I'll fix it up for the next version.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-08-27 19:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-08-27 19:08 [v2,5/7] x86: plumb error code and fault address through to fault handlers Andy Lutomirski
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-08-27 19:25 Jann Horn
2018-08-27 18:56 Jann Horn

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).