public inbox for linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avadhut Naik <avadnaik@amd.com>
To: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn>,
	kristo@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, tony.luck@intel.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, mchehab@kernel.org, rric@kernel.org
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] EDAC/ti: Fix possible null pointer dereference in _emif_get_id()
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:59:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf486746-6f96-4f09-bacb-8019e7f33756@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240724071042.1493917-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn>

On 7/24/24 02:10, Ma Ke wrote:
> In _emif_get_id(), of_get_address() may return NULL which is later
> dereferenced. Fix this bug by adding NULL check.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 86a18ee21e5e ("EDAC, ti: Add support for TI keystone and DRA7xx EDAC")
> Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - added Cc stable line.
> ---
>  drivers/edac/ti_edac.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/ti_edac.c b/drivers/edac/ti_edac.c
> index 29723c9592f7..db23887b2d81 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/ti_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/ti_edac.c
> @@ -207,6 +207,9 @@ static int _emif_get_id(struct device_node *node)
>  	int my_id = 0;
>  
>  	addrp = of_get_address(node, 0, NULL, NULL);
> +	if (!addrp)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	my_addr = (u32)of_translate_address(node, addrp);
>  
>  	for_each_matching_node(np, ti_edac_of_match) {

IIUC, the original v2 submitted seems to differ from this RESEND patch
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-edac/20240718134834.826890-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn/

Snippet from submitting-patches:
Don’t add “RESEND” when you are submitting a modified version of your patch or patch series - “RESEND” only applies to resubmission of a patch or patch series which have not been modified in any way from the previous submission.

Any specific reason for this change?

From a brief look, it seems that the original v2 was correct.
Check for NULL pointer deference might be required in both places
in _emif_get_id().

Also, some more context on how this was noticed might help.
Was it through mere observation?

Thanks,
Avadhut Naik

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-24 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-24  7:10 [PATCH v2 RESEND] EDAC/ti: Fix possible null pointer dereference in _emif_get_id() Ma Ke
2024-07-24 13:31 ` Greg KH
2024-07-24 17:59 ` Avadhut Naik [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cf486746-6f96-4f09-bacb-8019e7f33756@amd.com \
    --to=avadnaik@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kristo@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=make24@iscas.ac.cn \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=rric@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox