From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6342F2E3391 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 01:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=13.77.154.182 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741830284; cv=none; b=AeQLHn8BaXLzl2jy1MvQuBKOtbTVMaHm0rZpTuKeUPy1rNPaDLTjhj7UokTsCrBEioRiSBZsHKD8fgUpp94F3LY8iKY8srPznjQ6ID8VK+8LLnscyVE3f+Yyio3f71wsQkJ5So4JBZTS/NCxkn+QqEv2diTn6FbwhAUdRXsQI+8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741830284; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YYlpCkJulNi5p/XGo77WRx9Pzfz/1qQs48uR6a7fUAI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=q2Pwwm0t/ufnOTYa6pTpr2jeLCG3nKXZ6wHiStJlxqlaIc3xpZs1kUOwIgUkvEx+zAUQzWG6afin3LknTqDf5SH4f8mWyI3tfoT0tP0la1vX9LTMKAyttOiYTbMh388e+IMxnf2Zj8IINbmHHBZfim2cIdC774CavKrKFQutFLY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.microsoft.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b=Yjno+ko+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=13.77.154.182 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b="Yjno+ko+" Received: from [100.75.64.24] (unknown [40.78.12.246]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 278AF210B15B; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 18:44:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 278AF210B15B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1741830282; bh=Gmh/yp1T+xa5IJ6SgT9wvfwiGO15xa88j8hcZM3as4I=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Yjno+ko+xkPcFNUwyDamCfrWXtJZZKlTTchkrEoV22obxTFqrZSQeKxTFXHgYnhWZ EsJ2p4VuhDkZEG6qNHMw19y7VZHtCV2q8um5kLXku/TdnLBZvz0f4ygQ4hK0qOur2Q QzurBYqsB+XD5iJkuVmX25jkM0aKZdCBDnGS42yY= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 18:43:55 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Add L1 and L2 error detection for A53 and A57 To: Sascha Hauer , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org Cc: Borislav Petkov , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Tony Luck , James Morse , Robert Richter , York Sun , kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Marc Zyngier References: <20210401110615.15326-1-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Content-Language: en-US From: Vijay Balakrishna In-Reply-To: <20210401110615.15326-1-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 4/1/2021 4:06 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Hi, > > Resending this mainly because Marc Zyngier and Mark Rutland raised > concerns about using implementation defined registers and I forgot to Cc > them with the last version. This version, like v4 already, should fix > these concerns. Looking forward to feedback. We aim to revive and adapt this patch series for A72 and A78. Is anyone actively working on this? Please share any information on why it wasn't pursued and thoughts on adapting it to A72 and A78. Thanks, Vijay