From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: [v3,1/2] nfit, mce: only handle uncorrectable machine checks
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:26:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49d0nm2rd6.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> writes:
> Drop stable@
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 01:59:15PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Sorry for necroposting. I thought the point of the CEC was to make sure
>> that the other registered decoders only ever saw uncorrected errors.
>
> Ha, good point! You mean drivers/ras/cec.c, right?
Yes.
> If so, then I don't think we've ever talked about connecting CEC with
> NVDIMM and whether that would make sense. Lemme add Dan.
I don't think there's a difference between MCEs for NVDIMMs and normal
DRAM. I'll let Dan confirm or deny that.
>> How do we end up getting called with a correctable error?
>
> Good question. We shouldn't.
>
> So we need to figure out here how exactly should those things interact
> and whether NFIT should get all errors reported or it should put all the
> correctable errors through the decay thing, see the comment at the top
> of drivers/ras/cec.c
>
> Thx for pointing that out Jeff.
Sure, thanks for the quick reply, Boris! Also, thanks for your detailed
commit messages. They really help with understanding the code changes.
Cheers,
Jeff
next reply other threads:[~2019-02-20 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-20 19:26 Jeff Moyer [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-02-21 17:09 [v3,1/2] nfit, mce: only handle uncorrectable machine checks Borislav Petkov
2019-02-21 16:11 Jeff Moyer
2019-02-20 19:47 Borislav Petkov
2019-02-20 19:40 Dan Williams
2019-02-20 19:39 Borislav Petkov
2019-02-20 19:18 Borislav Petkov
2019-02-20 18:59 Jeff Moyer
2018-10-26 0:37 Vishal Verma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x49d0nm2rd6.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox