From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Christ, Austin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: capsule: allocate whole capsule into virtual memory Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:05:52 -0600 Message-ID: <02d22437-2aaf-5eb1-d61d-2e7c9e68b081@codeaurora.org> References: <1468600891-15794-1-git-send-email-austinwc@codeaurora.org> <20160721131230.GH26504@codeblueprint.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160721131230.GH26504-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Matt Fleming Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, jbrasen-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, Kweh Hock Leong , Bryan O'Donoghue List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Hey Matt, On 7/21/2016 7:12 AM, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul, at 10:41:31AM, Christ, Austin wrote: >> According to UEFI 2.6 section 7.5.3, the capsule should be in contiguous >> virtual memory and firmware may consume the capsule immediately. To >> correctly implement this functionality, the kernel driver needs to vmap >> the entire capsule at the time it is made available to firmware. >> >> The virtual allocation of the capsule update has been changed from kmap, >> which was only allocating the first page of the update, to vmap and >> allocates the entire data payload. >> >> Signed-off-by: Austin Christ >> --- >> drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c | 6 ++++-- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c >> index c99c24b..c4f3c20 100644 >> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c >> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ >> #include >> #include >> #include >> +#include >> >> #define NO_FURTHER_WRITE_ACTION -1 >> >> @@ -108,14 +109,15 @@ static ssize_t efi_capsule_submit_update(struct capsule_info *cap_info) >> int ret; >> void *cap_hdr_temp; >> >> - cap_hdr_temp = kmap(cap_info->pages[0]); >> + cap_hdr_temp = vmap(cap_info->pages, cap_info->index, >> + VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL); >> if (!cap_hdr_temp) { >> pr_debug("%s: kmap() failed\n", __func__); >> return -EFAULT; >> } >> >> ret = efi_capsule_update(cap_hdr_temp, cap_info->pages); >> - kunmap(cap_info->pages[0]); >> + vunmap(cap_hdr_temp); >> if (ret) { >> pr_err("%s: efi_capsule_update() failed\n", __func__); >> return ret; > Looks OK to me but could you also update the comments above > efi_capsule_update() that mention the virtual mapping only being > required for the first page? That's a great point. The comments will be updated in v2. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Thanks, Austin