From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joeyli Subject: Re: [PATCH] efivarfs: Never return ENOENT from firmware again Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 16:32:26 +0800 Message-ID: <1368520346.21417.180.camel@linux-s257.site> References: <5b6476bf31dc699a0e6f3983e78447eeac34d831.1368180585.git.lxiang@redhat.com> <51913D4B.2000606@intel.com> <1368506197.21417.172.camel@linux-s257.site> <5191E4E0.7020505@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5191E4E0.7020505@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matt Fleming Cc: Lingzhu Xiang , Jeremy Kerr , Matthew Garrett , linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Josh Boyer , Andy Whitcroft List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org =E6=96=BC =E4=BA=8C=EF=BC=8C2013-05-14 =E6=96=BC 08:16 +0100=EF=BC=8CMa= tt Fleming =E6=8F=90=E5=88=B0=EF=BC=9A > On 05/14/2013 05:36 AM, joeyli wrote: > > I found the "[PATCH] x86, efi: initial the local variable of DataSi= ze to > > zero" lost in urgent branch, and it also didn't in Linus's v3.10-rc= 1. > >=20 > > Did this patch move to other branch? >=20 > It appears I dropped this patch when doing the rebase against -rc1. I= 'm > really sorry about that. I've applied it again. Thanks for your help! >=20 > Thanks for being so diligent. > -- That because I need apply this patch on v3.9 and v3.10 when debugging issue on Acer machine. Thank a lot! Joey Lee