From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Salter Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] Add proper definitions for some EFI function pointers. Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:57:39 -0400 Message-ID: <1376402259.27484.21.camel@t520.redhat.com> References: <1376090777-20090-1-git-send-email-roy.franz@linaro.org> <1376090777-20090-12-git-send-email-roy.franz@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1376090777-20090-12-git-send-email-roy.franz@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Roy Franz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, matt.fleming@intel.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, leif.lindholm@linaro.org, dave.martin@arm.com List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 16:26 -0700, Roy Franz wrote: > The x86/AMD64 EFI stubs must us a call wrapper to convert between > the Linux and EFI ABIs, so void pointers are sufficient. For ARM, > the ABIs are compatible, so we can directly invoke the function > pointers. The functions that are used by the ARM stub are updated > to match the EFI definitions. > > Signed-off-by: Roy Franz > --- Tested on arm64. Acked-by: Mark Salter