From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joeyli Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:32:52 +0800 Message-ID: <1378891972.6193.137.camel@linux-s257.site> References: <1378741786-18430-1-git-send-email-matthew.garrett@nebula.com> <19562.1378747124@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1378767723.17982.27.camel@x230.lan> <1378774394.17982.36.camel@x230.lan> <1378781715.17982.42.camel@x230.lan> <1378785208.17982.54.camel@x230.lan> <20130910172318.GB21530@khazad-dum.debian.net> <1378837571.17615.0.camel@x230.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1378837571.17615.0.camel-+5W/JHIUVxg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , David Lang , "Valdis.Kletnieks-PjAqaU27lzQ@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org" , "gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , "hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , "linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org" , "linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org =E6=96=BC =E4=BA=8C=EF=BC=8C2013-09-10 =E6=96=BC 18:26 +0000=EF=BC=8CMa= tthew Garrett =E6=8F=90=E5=88=B0=EF=BC=9A > On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 14:23 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > That's why modern systems require signed firmware updates. > >=20 > > Linux doesn't. Is someone working on adding signature support to t= he > > runtime firmware loader? >=20 > It'd be simple to do so, but so far the model appears to be that devi= ces > that expect signed firmware enforce that themselves. >=20 > --=20 > Matthew Garrett > NrybX=C7=A7v^)=DE=BA{.n+{y^nrz=1Ah&=1EGh=03(=E9=9A=8E=DD=A2j"=1A=1Bmz= =DE=96fh~m Takashi has a implementation of firmware check: [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] Add firmware signature file check https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/8/343 Thanks Joey Lee