* [PATCH] x86/efi: delay efi_esrt_init to efi_late_init
@ 2016-08-08 22:08 Ricardo Neri
[not found] ` <1470694104-9278-1-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Neri @ 2016-08-08 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Matt Fleming; +Cc: Ricardo Neri, Peter Jones
Commit 7b02d53e7852 introduced a new efi_mem_reserve to reserve the boot
services memory regions forever. This reservation involves allocating a new
EFI memory range descriptor. However, allocation can only succeed if there
is memory available for the allocation. Otherwise, error such as the
following may occur:
esrt: Reserving ESRT space from 0x000000003dd6a000 to 0x000000003dd6a010.
Kernel panic - not syncing: ERROR: Failed to allocate 0x9f0 bytes below 0x0.
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.7.0-rc5+ #503
0000000000000000 ffffffff81e03ce0 ffffffff8131dae8 ffffffff81bb6c50
ffffffff81e03d70 ffffffff81e03d60 ffffffff8111f4df 0000000000000018
ffffffff81e03d70 ffffffff81e03d08 00000000000009f0 00000000000009f0
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8131dae8>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x65
[<ffffffff8111f4df>] panic+0xc5/0x206
[<ffffffff81f7c6d3>] memblock_alloc_base+0x29/0x2e
[<ffffffff81f7c6e3>] memblock_alloc+0xb/0xd
[<ffffffff81f6c86d>] efi_arch_mem_reserve+0xbc/0x134
[<ffffffff81fa3280>] efi_mem_reserve+0x2c/0x31
[<ffffffff81fa3280>] ? efi_mem_reserve+0x2c/0x31
[<ffffffff81fa40d3>] efi_esrt_init+0x19e/0x1b4
[<ffffffff81f6d2dd>] efi_init+0x398/0x44a
[<ffffffff81f5c782>] setup_arch+0x415/0xc30
[<ffffffff81f55af1>] start_kernel+0x5b/0x3ef
[<ffffffff81f55434>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2f/0x31
[<ffffffff81f55520>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xea/0xed
---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: ERROR: Failed to allocate 0x9f0
bytes below 0x0.
An inspection of the memblock configuration reveals that there is no memory
available for the allocation:
MEMBLOCK configuration:
memory size = 0x0 reserved size = 0x4f339c0
memory.cnt = 0x1
memory[0x0] [0x00000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff], 0x0 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0
reserved.cnt = 0x4
reserved[0x0] [0x0000000008c000-0x0000000008c9bf], 0x9c0 bytes flags: 0x0
reserved[0x1] [0x0000000009f000-0x000000000fffff], 0x61000 bytes flags: 0x0
reserved[0x2] [0x00000002800000-0x0000000394bfff], 0x114c000 bytes flags: 0x0
reserved[0x3] [0x000000304e4000-0x00000034269fff], 0x3d86000 bytes flags: 0x0
efi_esrt_init is called from efi_init, which in x86 happens before
memblock_x86_fill is called. Since ESRT is not critical to boot but to
runtime, its initialization can be safely delayed to efi_late_init.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Peter Jones <pjones-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
index ef9b6ab..d92c174 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
@@ -475,12 +475,11 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
if (efi_enabled(EFI_DBG))
efi_print_memmap();
-
- efi_esrt_init();
}
void __init efi_late_init(void)
{
+ efi_esrt_init();
efi_bgrt_init();
}
--
2.9.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread[parent not found: <1470694104-9278-1-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: delay efi_esrt_init to efi_late_init [not found] ` <1470694104-9278-1-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> @ 2016-08-11 10:29 ` Matt Fleming [not found] ` <20160811102955.GB30909-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Matt Fleming @ 2016-08-11 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ricardo Neri Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Peter Jones, Ard Biesheuvel On Mon, 08 Aug, at 03:08:24PM, Ricardo Neri wrote: > Commit 7b02d53e7852 introduced a new efi_mem_reserve to reserve the boot > services memory regions forever. This reservation involves allocating a new > EFI memory range descriptor. However, allocation can only succeed if there > is memory available for the allocation. Otherwise, error such as the > following may occur: > > esrt: Reserving ESRT space from 0x000000003dd6a000 to 0x000000003dd6a010. > Kernel panic - not syncing: ERROR: Failed to allocate 0x9f0 bytes below 0x0. > CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.7.0-rc5+ #503 > 0000000000000000 ffffffff81e03ce0 ffffffff8131dae8 ffffffff81bb6c50 > ffffffff81e03d70 ffffffff81e03d60 ffffffff8111f4df 0000000000000018 > ffffffff81e03d70 ffffffff81e03d08 00000000000009f0 00000000000009f0 > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff8131dae8>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x65 > [<ffffffff8111f4df>] panic+0xc5/0x206 > [<ffffffff81f7c6d3>] memblock_alloc_base+0x29/0x2e > [<ffffffff81f7c6e3>] memblock_alloc+0xb/0xd > [<ffffffff81f6c86d>] efi_arch_mem_reserve+0xbc/0x134 > [<ffffffff81fa3280>] efi_mem_reserve+0x2c/0x31 > [<ffffffff81fa3280>] ? efi_mem_reserve+0x2c/0x31 > [<ffffffff81fa40d3>] efi_esrt_init+0x19e/0x1b4 > [<ffffffff81f6d2dd>] efi_init+0x398/0x44a > [<ffffffff81f5c782>] setup_arch+0x415/0xc30 > [<ffffffff81f55af1>] start_kernel+0x5b/0x3ef > [<ffffffff81f55434>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2f/0x31 > [<ffffffff81f55520>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xea/0xed > ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: ERROR: Failed to allocate 0x9f0 > bytes below 0x0. > > An inspection of the memblock configuration reveals that there is no memory > available for the allocation: > > MEMBLOCK configuration: > memory size = 0x0 reserved size = 0x4f339c0 > memory.cnt = 0x1 > memory[0x0] [0x00000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff], 0x0 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0 > reserved.cnt = 0x4 > reserved[0x0] [0x0000000008c000-0x0000000008c9bf], 0x9c0 bytes flags: 0x0 > reserved[0x1] [0x0000000009f000-0x000000000fffff], 0x61000 bytes flags: 0x0 > reserved[0x2] [0x00000002800000-0x0000000394bfff], 0x114c000 bytes flags: 0x0 > reserved[0x3] [0x000000304e4000-0x00000034269fff], 0x3d86000 bytes flags: 0x0 > > efi_esrt_init is called from efi_init, which in x86 happens before > memblock_x86_fill is called. Since ESRT is not critical to boot but to > runtime, its initialization can be safely delayed to efi_late_init. Ouch. This looks like the right thing to do now that we no longer need to reserve the ESRT data before efi_reserve_boot_services() runs. Ard, could you confirm that this isn't does not exist for ARM/arm64? It looks like reserve_regions() takes care of adding all RAM from the EFI memmap, so efi_esrt_init() is free to make allocations. Actually Ricardo, there's a slight hiccup with this patch in that efi_esrt_init() is now being called at very different points during boot. ARM/arm64 call it at efi_init() time and the early_memremap() calls in the ESRT driver make sense, but those calls don't make sense when invoked from efi_late_init() on x86. Look how the ACPI BGRT driver makes use of the standard memremap() API. Instead, could you fold this call into the same location as efi_find_mirror() and co. in x86's setup_arch()? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20160811102955.GB30909-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: delay efi_esrt_init to efi_late_init [not found] ` <20160811102955.GB30909-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> @ 2016-08-17 0:36 ` Ricardo Neri 2016-08-22 10:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Ricardo Neri @ 2016-08-17 0:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matt Fleming Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Peter Jones, Ard Biesheuvel On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 11:29 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > Actually Ricardo, there's a slight hiccup with this patch in that > efi_esrt_init() is now being called at very different points during > boot. > > ARM/arm64 call it at efi_init() time and the early_memremap() > calls in the ESRT driver make sense, but those calls don't make sense > when invoked from efi_late_init() on x86. Look how the ACPI BGRT > driver makes use of the standard memremap() API. Ah, I just checked. Perhaps efi_late_init is too late. Also, one question for my knowledge, why the ESRT driver uses eary_memremap()? Can't it uses the regular memremap as the EFI BGRT driver? As far as I can see, it only exposes ESRT objects in sysfs. > > Instead, could you fold this call into the same location as > efi_find_mirror() and co. in x86's setup_arch()? Sure. I just sent a v2 with your suggestion. Thanks and BR, Ricardo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: delay efi_esrt_init to efi_late_init [not found] ` <20160811102955.GB30909-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> 2016-08-17 0:36 ` Ricardo Neri @ 2016-08-22 10:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2016-08-22 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matt Fleming Cc: Ricardo Neri, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Peter Jones On 11 August 2016 at 12:29, Matt Fleming <matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Mon, 08 Aug, at 03:08:24PM, Ricardo Neri wrote: >> Commit 7b02d53e7852 introduced a new efi_mem_reserve to reserve the boot >> services memory regions forever. This reservation involves allocating a new >> EFI memory range descriptor. However, allocation can only succeed if there >> is memory available for the allocation. Otherwise, error such as the >> following may occur: >> >> esrt: Reserving ESRT space from 0x000000003dd6a000 to 0x000000003dd6a010. >> Kernel panic - not syncing: ERROR: Failed to allocate 0x9f0 bytes below 0x0. >> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.7.0-rc5+ #503 >> 0000000000000000 ffffffff81e03ce0 ffffffff8131dae8 ffffffff81bb6c50 >> ffffffff81e03d70 ffffffff81e03d60 ffffffff8111f4df 0000000000000018 >> ffffffff81e03d70 ffffffff81e03d08 00000000000009f0 00000000000009f0 >> Call Trace: >> [<ffffffff8131dae8>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x65 >> [<ffffffff8111f4df>] panic+0xc5/0x206 >> [<ffffffff81f7c6d3>] memblock_alloc_base+0x29/0x2e >> [<ffffffff81f7c6e3>] memblock_alloc+0xb/0xd >> [<ffffffff81f6c86d>] efi_arch_mem_reserve+0xbc/0x134 >> [<ffffffff81fa3280>] efi_mem_reserve+0x2c/0x31 >> [<ffffffff81fa3280>] ? efi_mem_reserve+0x2c/0x31 >> [<ffffffff81fa40d3>] efi_esrt_init+0x19e/0x1b4 >> [<ffffffff81f6d2dd>] efi_init+0x398/0x44a >> [<ffffffff81f5c782>] setup_arch+0x415/0xc30 >> [<ffffffff81f55af1>] start_kernel+0x5b/0x3ef >> [<ffffffff81f55434>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2f/0x31 >> [<ffffffff81f55520>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xea/0xed >> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: ERROR: Failed to allocate 0x9f0 >> bytes below 0x0. >> >> An inspection of the memblock configuration reveals that there is no memory >> available for the allocation: >> >> MEMBLOCK configuration: >> memory size = 0x0 reserved size = 0x4f339c0 >> memory.cnt = 0x1 >> memory[0x0] [0x00000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff], 0x0 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0 >> reserved.cnt = 0x4 >> reserved[0x0] [0x0000000008c000-0x0000000008c9bf], 0x9c0 bytes flags: 0x0 >> reserved[0x1] [0x0000000009f000-0x000000000fffff], 0x61000 bytes flags: 0x0 >> reserved[0x2] [0x00000002800000-0x0000000394bfff], 0x114c000 bytes flags: 0x0 >> reserved[0x3] [0x000000304e4000-0x00000034269fff], 0x3d86000 bytes flags: 0x0 >> >> efi_esrt_init is called from efi_init, which in x86 happens before >> memblock_x86_fill is called. Since ESRT is not critical to boot but to >> runtime, its initialization can be safely delayed to efi_late_init. > > Ouch. This looks like the right thing to do now that we no longer need > to reserve the ESRT data before efi_reserve_boot_services() runs. > > Ard, could you confirm that this isn't does not exist for ARM/arm64? > It looks like reserve_regions() takes care of adding all RAM from the > EFI memmap, so efi_esrt_init() is free to make allocations. > Apologies for the tardiness. But indeed. efi_esrt_init() is called right after reserve_regions(), and so memblock_alloc() should be able to succeed at this time, if it weren't for the case that we don't allocate new EFI memmap entries on ARM to begin with (and the memblock_reserve() in efi_mem_reserve() is perfectly safe even before reserve_regions() has executed) -- Ard. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-22 10:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-08 22:08 [PATCH] x86/efi: delay efi_esrt_init to efi_late_init Ricardo Neri
[not found] ` <1470694104-9278-1-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-11 10:29 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20160811102955.GB30909-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-17 0:36 ` Ricardo Neri
2016-08-22 10:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).