From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH V14 02/10] ras: acpi/apei: cper: generic error data entry v3 per ACPI 6.1 Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:40:03 -0700 Message-ID: <1492015203.28586.1.camel@perches.com> References: <1490729440-32591-1-git-send-email-tbaicar@codeaurora.org> <1490729440-32591-3-git-send-email-tbaicar@codeaurora.org> <20170412133447.n2yft7v266v6k6gh@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170412133447.n2yft7v266v6k6gh@pd.tnic> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu To: Borislav Petkov , Tyler Baicar Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, robert.moore@intel.com, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, lv.zheng@intel.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, fu.wei@linaro.org, zjzhang@codeaurora.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, gengdongjiu@huawei.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, eun.taik.lee@samsung.com, shijie.huang@arm.com, labbott@redhat.com, lenb@kernel.org, harba@codeaurora.org, john.garry@huawei.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, punit.agrawal@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, nkaje@codeaurora.org, sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devel@acpica.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, rruigrok@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, astone@redhat.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, bristot@redhat.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 15:34 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:30:32PM -0600, Tyler Baicar wrote: > > Currently when a RAS error is reported it is not timestamped. [] > > diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h [] > > +#define acpi_hest_generic_data_error_length(gdata) \ > > + (((struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(gdata))->error_data_length) > > +#define acpi_hest_generic_data_size(gdata) \ > > + ((acpi_hest_generic_data_version(gdata) >= 3) ? \ > > + sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300) : \ > > + sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_data)) > > +#define acpi_hest_generic_data_record_size(gdata) \ > > + (acpi_hest_generic_data_size(gdata) + \ > > + acpi_hest_generic_data_error_length(gdata)) > > +#define acpi_hest_generic_data_next(gdata) \ > > + ((void *)(gdata) + acpi_hest_generic_data_record_size(gdata)) > > This is one unreadable pile of too long names with a clearly redundant > and too long prefix. Please shorten it all. Naming is generally author's choice and internal consistency has value too. acpi_hest_generic is already used throughout this codebase in multiple files and paths. > > @@ -73,3 +85,13 @@ static inline void ghes_edac_unregister(struct ghes *ghes) > > { > > } > > #endif > > + > > +#define acpi_hest_generic_data_version(gdata) \ > > + (gdata->revision >> 8) > > + > > +static inline void *acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata) > > Lemme try to shorten it: > > static inline void *acpi_hest_get_payload(struct acpi_hest_gdata *d) > { > if (hest_gdata_ver(d) >= 3) > return (void *)(((struct acpi_hest_gdata_v3 *)d) + 1); > else > return d + 1; > } > > Now this is much more readable IMO. You can actually see what's going > on. And you still know what the struct names are. trivial: unnecessary cast to void *