From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:34:52 +0000 Message-ID: <20121101213452.GA20564@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1351780935.2391.58.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <1351783096.2391.77.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <1351803800.2391.96.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <20121101210634.GA19723@srcf.ucam.org> <20121101213127.5967327f@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> <20121101212843.GA20309@srcf.ucam.org> <20121101213751.377ebaa8@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121101213751.377ebaa8@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: James Bottomley , Eric Paris , Jiri Kosina , Oliver Neukum , Chris Friesen , Josh Boyer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 09:37:51PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:28:43 +0000 > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Lawyers won't remove blacklist entries. > > Fear Uncertainty and Doubt > > Courts do, injunctions do, the possibilty of getting caught with theirs > hands in the till does. I think you've misunderstood. Blacklist updates are append only. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org