From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alessandro Zummo Subject: Re: [RFE PATCH 1/2] x86, rtc, ntp, Do full rtc synchronization with ntp Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:04:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20130225160409.6ec6ec57@linux.lan.towertech.it> References: <1360861375-24131-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com> <1360861375-24131-2-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com> <5127D853.6030703@linaro.org> <512A4A19.2090800@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <512A4A19.2090800-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Prarit Bhargava Cc: John Stultz , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Thomas Gleixner , x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Matt Fleming , David Vrabel , Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 12:12:57 -0500 Prarit Bhargava wrote: > Given the test results I think this should go in earlier rather than later; I'd > like to target 3.10 for the full sync, and possibly 3.11 for the HCTOSYS stuff. > > ... unless anyone has a strenuous objection ;) looks reasonable. I prefer == 0 instead of !rtc_valid_tm(&tm), but it's just a cosmetic issue. -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy http://www.towertech.it