From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Borislav Petkov <bp-Gina5bIWoIWzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86, efi: Add an efi= kernel command line parameter
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 21:41:34 +0200
Message-ID: <20130606194134.GN20972@pd.tnic>
References: <1370177770-26661-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de>
 <1370177770-26661-4-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de>
 <20130606104224.GH30420@console-pimps.org>
 <20130606132603.GD20972@pd.tnic>
 <20130606175052.GA1285@srcf.ucam.org>
 <20130606185140.GK20972@pd.tnic>
 <20130606193548.GA2946@srcf.ucam.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130606193548.GA2946-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org>
Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>, Linux EFI <linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>, X86-ML <x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:35:48PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> No, I think that's the wrong thing to do. We should set up the current
> mappings and the 1:1 mappings, and pass the current mappings through
> SetVirtualAddressMap(). That matches the behaviour of Windows.

And when do we use the 1:1 mappings and when the current mappings when
doing runtime calls?

Also, would the 1:1 mappings even work if not passed through
SetVirtualAddressMap? I'm sensing a "yes" but I don't know...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--