From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86, efi: Add an efi= kernel command line parameter Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 21:30:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20130606203057.GA4237@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20130606104224.GH30420@console-pimps.org> <20130606132603.GD20972@pd.tnic> <20130606175052.GA1285@srcf.ucam.org> <20130606185140.GK20972@pd.tnic> <20130606193548.GA2946@srcf.ucam.org> <20130606194134.GN20972@pd.tnic> <20130606195450.GA3252@srcf.ucam.org> <20130606200705.GO20972@pd.tnic> <20130606201828.GA3950@srcf.ucam.org> <20130606202717.GP20972@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130606202717.GP20972-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Matt Fleming , Linux EFI , Jiri Kosina , X86-ML , LKML , Borislav Petkov List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:27:17PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:18:28PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > kexec seems like a lower priority than compatibility. Perhaps keep the > > efi argument for people who want to use kexec? > > This is what I currently have in the code: if you boot with efi=1:1_map, > you get them. Well, we want the 1:1 mappings to exist all the time. The only thing the option should change is whether they're passed to SetVirtualAddressMap() or not. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org