From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: UEFI Plugfest 2013 -- New Orleans Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:55:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20130819125507.GA19093@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20130816152030.GL2133@tuxdriver.com> <1376900735.2322.26.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1376900735.2322.26.camel-Fexsq3y4057IgHVZqg5X0TlWvGAXklZc@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: David Woodhouse Cc: "John W. Linville" , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 09:25:35AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > Every deviation from the spec (or common sense), however minor, should > show up as a clear failure. Even the ones we *have* been able to work > around, because we still want them *fixed*. Why? It's not like we can ever stop carrying that code. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org