From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] efi: Remove EFI_PAGE_SHIFT and EFI_PAGE_SIZE Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 17:41:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20130921154143.GC1587@pd.tnic> References: <1379602494-26684-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> <1379602494-26684-3-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> <20130920104249.GA21381@console-pimps.org> <20130921152139.GG2737@rocoto.smurfnet.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130921152139.GG2737@rocoto.smurfnet.nu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Leif Lindholm Cc: Matt Fleming , Mark Salter , X86 ML , LKML , Borislav Petkov , Matthew Garrett , "H. Peter Anvin" , James Bottomley , Vivek Goyal , Dave Young , linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Roy Franz List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 05:21:39PM +0200, Leif Lindholm wrote: > It will probably not be a problem on the stub side, and it's not used > in many places but it would break efi_lookup_mapped_address(), > efi_range_is_wc() and memrange_efi_to_native() for use by arm64. > At least the first of these would be a problem. Ok, maybe the generic header include/linux/efi.h might be a problem but the rest are changes to arch/x86/ which should have no effect whatsoever on any other arch. Or are you planning to move some of it into generic code? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --