From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] efi: Capsule update support and pstore backend Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:19:39 +0100 Message-ID: <20131016141939.GA28684@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1381931460-6999-1-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org> <1381931460-6999-6-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1381931460-6999-6-git-send-email-matt-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Matt Fleming Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Andi Kleen , Tony Luck , Seiji Aguchi , x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Matt Fleming List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 02:51:00PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > + Many EFI machines have buggy implementations of the UpdateCapsule() > + runtime service. This option will enable code that may not function > + correctly with your firmware. Where by "May not function correctly" you mean "May crash the system"? I'm a little uneasy having this run by default if enabled, even if it's disabled by default in the config. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org