From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] EFI changes Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:52:15 +0000 Message-ID: <20131028155215.GN1982@console-pimps.org> References: <20131028123528.GM1982@console-pimps.org> <20131028134413.GA10163@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131028134413.GA10163-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 28 Oct, at 02:44:13PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > and this breaks the ARM build: > > In file included from /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:44: > /home/mingo/tip/include/linux/efi.h:842:21: error: asm/efi.h: No such file or directory > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c: In function 'start_kernel': > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:638: error: implicit declaration of function 'efi_enabled' > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:639: error: implicit declaration of function 'efi_late_init' > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:640: error: implicit declaration of function 'efi_free_boot_services' Ah, that's my own fault because my 'next' branch doesn't include the ARM EFI support. Where did you get the patches from? Are they in linux-next? I'm inclined to drop the cleanup patch for now and do it later, once things have settled because it's also causing conflicts for Borislav's work. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center