From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] kexec kernel efi runtime support Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:32:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20131210233207.GI31437@pd.tnic> References: <1386582147-9802-1-git-send-email-dyoung@redhat.com> <20131210152549.7975e3ac25d854e2ada63221@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131210152549.7975e3ac25d854e2ada63221@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Dave Young , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, hpa@zytor.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, horms@verge.net.au, kexec@lists.infradead.org, greg@kroah.com, matt@console-pimps.org, toshi.kani@hp.com List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:25:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 17:42:13 +0800 Dave Young wrote: > > > Here is the V5 patchset for supporting kexec kernel efi runtime. > > It's unclear (to me) who's supposed to merge this lot. It's a "kexec" > patch which actually hits on efi and x86. > > I grabbed them for some -next testing but won't be offended if someone > else merges them ;) I was under the impression that this should go through Matt's efi tree. Oh, and we need to finish reviewing them so picking them up now would be too premature, IMHO. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --