From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi: Fix krealloc defect Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:17:25 +0000 Message-ID: <20140113191725.GK3256@console-pimps.org> References: <9a8eb1c9478049318e834d5223053a5fb7484bff.1388793978.git.joe@perches.com> <20140113140334.GB3256@console-pimps.org> <1389635241.24849.22.camel@joe-AO722> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1389635241.24849.22.camel@joe-AO722> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Joe Perches Cc: Matt Fleming , Matthew Garrett , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 13 Jan, at 09:47:21AM, Joe Perches wrote: > > If it's queued up in some tree of yours, should that > tree be included in Stephen Rothwell's -next? My trees get pulled into tip and those are included in linux-next. So, Borislav's patch is commit ee4114302770 ("x86/efi: Check krealloc return value") in today's linux-next. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center