From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: UEFI support Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:35:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20140429163517.GA18644@localhost> References: <1398442154-19974-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org> <20140429102817.GE17007@arm.com> <20140429114356.GK26088@console-pimps.org> <20140429134726.GH17007@arm.com> <20140429144713.GL26088@console-pimps.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140429144713.GL26088@console-pimps.org> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matt Fleming Cc: Leif Lindholm , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "msalter@redhat.com" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "roy.franz@linaro.org" , "ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" , Mark Rutland , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Stephen Rothwell , Linus Torvalds List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 03:47:13PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr, at 02:47:28PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Given that Leif's series contains both generic efi and arm64 patches, > > what's your preference for merging them? I'm happy to add my ack and > > they go via your tree (or the other way around). > > I'm happy either way, though if I take them through my tree (and > subsequently through tip) you won't have to worry about the merge window > rigmarole, which is a plus. > > So, eveyone happy for me to take these with Catalin's Acked-by? Fine by me. Just in case I haven't stated it explicitly for this series: Acked-by: Catalin Marinas Thanks. -- Catalin