From: Matt Fleming <matt-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
To: Dave Young <dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org,
mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] earlyprintk=efi,keep fix
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 11:12:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140501101220.GP26088@console-pimps.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140430021303.GA12316-4/PLUo9XfK/1wF9wiOj0lkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, 30 Apr, at 10:13:03AM, Dave Young wrote:
>
> earlyprintk=efi,keep will cause kernel hangs while freeing initmem like below:
> [ 2.826089] VFS: Mounted root (ext4 filesystem) readonly on device 254:2.
> [ 2.846592] devtmpfs: mounted
> [ 2.856974] Freeing unused kernel memory: 880K (ffffffff817d4000 - ffffffff818b0000)
>
> It is caused by efi earlyprintk use __init function which will be freed later.
> Such as early_efi_write is marked as __init, also it will use early_ioremap
> which is init function as well.
>
> To fix this issue, I added one early initcall efi_ioremap_fb which will map the whole
> efi fb for later use. OTOH, adding a wrapper function efi_ioremap which will call
> early_ioremap before ioremap is available.
>
> With this patch applied efi boot ok with earlyprintk=efi,keep console=efi
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/platform/efi/early_printk.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Thanks Dave, good catch. I've got a few comments below.
> +static __init int efi_ioremap_fb(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long base, size;
> +
> + base = boot_params.screen_info.lfb_base;
> + size = boot_params.screen_info.lfb_size;
> + efi_fb = ioremap(base, size);
> +
> + return efi_fb ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +early_initcall(efi_ioremap_fb);
So, here you're actually ioremap'ing the framebuffer irrespective of
whether anyone passed earlyprintk=efi,keep on the command line.
Furthermore, you'll perform the ioremap() even if some error was
encountered in early_efi_setup().
You need a way to figure out whether the ioremap() is actually needed.
Please document this function to explain why we need to ioremap() the
framebuffer from an early_initcall().
Oh and as a side note, please prefix functions in this file with
early_efi_*. Yeah, I realise that I suggested efi_ioremap() as a name -
my bad.
> +static __init_refok void *efi_ioremap(unsigned long start, unsigned long len)
> +{
> + unsigned long base;
> +
> + base = boot_params.screen_info.lfb_base;
> + if (efi_fb)
> + return (efi_fb + start - base);
> + else
> + return early_ioremap(start, len);
> +}
Adding .lfb_base in the caller and then subtracting here seems
needlessly complicated. Instead I'd suggest making early_efi_map() take
an offset and a length, and document when each framebuffer is used.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-01 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-30 2:13 [PATCH] earlyprintk=efi,keep fix Dave Young
[not found] ` <20140430021303.GA12316-4/PLUo9XfK/1wF9wiOj0lkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-30 19:52 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20140430125211.cb33039fc1248c953bcc13dc-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-30 19:57 ` Matt Fleming
2014-05-01 10:12 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
[not found] ` <20140501101220.GP26088-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-01 13:17 ` Dave Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140501101220.GP26088@console-pimps.org \
--to=matt-hnk1s37rvnbexh+ff434mdi2o/jbrioy@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).