From: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, eboot: Support initrd loaded above 4G
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 16:10:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140715151025.GB32039@console-pimps.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140711074029.GD5952@console-pimps.org>
On Fri, 11 Jul, at 08:40:29AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> I'm not exactly sure what's wrong with the buffer - whether it's a case
> of not being able to access it properly or somehing buggy in the EFI
> code for reading files. No fault occurs when reading into it, it just
> doesn't contain the correct data.
>
> Either way, I'm going to leave your patch as-is and just ensure I fix
> this before the merge window. I think it's a good idea to have whatever
> workaround we come up with documented via an entirely separate patch.
I spent some time playing around with this bug and it appears to be
triggered by the read-a-chunk-at-a-time logic in handle_cmdline_files(),
(which is itself a bug workaround) introduced here,
commit 2d2da60fb40a
Author: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Dec 16 13:30:58 2011 +0100
x86, efi: Break up large initrd reads
The efi boot stub tries to read the entire initrd in 1 go, however
some efi implementations hang if too much if asked to read too much
data at the same time. After some experimentation I found out that my
asrock p67 board will hang if asked to read chunks of 4MiB, so use a
safe value.
elilo reads in chunks of 16KiB, but since that requires many read
calls I use a value of 1 MiB. hpa suggested adding individual
blacklists for when systems are found where this value causes a crash.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4EEB3A02.3090201@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Setting EFI_READ_CHUNK_SIZE to -1 (disabling the chunk workaround)
allows everything to work just fine. Any chunk value smaller than the
initrd file size causes the bug to trigger on my machine.
Going forward, I suspect any attempts to use the EFI File Protocol are
going to result in this kind of breakage, and that the only thing that
can be relied upon is the Disk I/O Protocol.
But doing Disk I/O would necessitate adding the in-kernel FAT driver to
the EFI boot stub, which is a scary idea (though not without merit).
On the flip-side, we've no infrastructure in the EFI boot stub for doing
blacklisting via DMI, so there's no way currently to automatically
disable the chunk-read workaround for known buggy machines.
The simplest solution is to require that the user pull some kind of
kernel parameter on the command line to explicitly disable the
workaround, but that's a pretty lame prospect.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-15 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-14 19:23 [PATCH] x86, eboot: Support initrd loaded above 4G Yinghai Lu
2014-06-18 14:28 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20140618142819.GN24049-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-09 18:26 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20140709182651.GB15932-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-10 18:00 ` Yinghai Lu
[not found] ` <CAE9FiQVP6d5GhFBBmX5HDo0w0oKJSizdKvepq5t6vhGNj=W9sg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-11 7:40 ` Matt Fleming
2014-07-15 15:10 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
[not found] ` <20140715151025.GB32039-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-15 15:24 ` Michael Brown
2014-07-15 15:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] ` <53C54C62.8070403-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-16 14:34 ` Matt Fleming
2014-07-16 14:45 ` Michael Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140715151025.GB32039@console-pimps.org \
--to=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=leif.lindholm@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox