From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: 3.12 to 3.13 boot regression bisected - still applies to 3.16 Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 10:18:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20140805091848.GN15082@console-pimps.org> References: <20140804113435.34ed8c76@pluto> <20140804122728.GH15082@console-pimps.org> <20140804150627.4563b6a7@pluto> <20140804135452.GJ15082@console-pimps.org> <20140805100242.425e1093@pluto> <20140805084542.GM15082@console-pimps.org> <20140805111330.3cf9319f@pluto> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140805111330.3cf9319f@pluto> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bruno =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pr=E9mont?= Cc: P J P , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 05 Aug, at 11:13:30AM, Bruno Pr=E9mont wrote: >=20 > I get at least to just before > status =3D efi_call_early(exit_boot_services, handle, key); > in eboot.c on line 1310. A efi_printk inserted there is displayed. This is worth pointing out in case you're unaware, but do you know that it's not valid to call efi_printk() after ExitBootServices()? Doing so will almost certainly cause your machine to fault. --=20 Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center