public inbox for linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
	<leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
	<roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	"matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
	<matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org"
	<msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/efi: set PE/COFF section alignment to 4 KB
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:33:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141010103301.GC4076@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412933124-13018-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

Hi Ard,

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:25:24AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Position independent AArch64 code needs to be linked and loaded at the same
> relative offset from a 4 KB boundary, or adrp/add and adrp/ldr pairs will
> not work correctly. (This is how PC relative symbol references with a 4 GB
> reach are emitted)
> 
> We need to declare this in the PE/COFF header, otherwise the PE/COFF loader
> may load the Image and invoke the stub at an offset which violates this rule.

Has this been observed happening, or was this just found by inspection?

> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/head.S | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> index 0a6e4f924df8..5e83e5b8a9de 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ optional_header:
>  
>  extra_header_fields:
>  	.quad	0				// ImageBase
> -	.long	0x20				// SectionAlignment
> +	.long	0x1000				// SectionAlignment
>  	.long	0x8				// FileAlignment
>  	.short	0				// MajorOperatingSystemVersion
>  	.short	0				// MinorOperatingSystemVersion
> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ section_table:
>  	.short	0		// NumberOfRelocations  (0 for executables)
>  	.short	0		// NumberOfLineNumbers  (0 for executables)
>  	.long	0xe0500020	// Characteristics (section flags)
> -	.align 5
> +	.align 12

Can we get a comment explaining why stext needs the additional
alignment? Something like:

	/*
	 * EFI will load stext onwards at the 4k section alignment
	 * described in the PE/COFF header. To ensure that instruction
	 * sequences using an adrp and a :lo12: immediate will function
	 * correctly at this alignment, we must ensure that stext is
	 * placed at a 4k boundary in the Image to begin with.
	 */
	.align 12

Otherwise this looks sane to me.

Thanks,
Mark.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-10 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-10  9:25 [PATCH] arm64/efi: set PE/COFF section alignment to 4 KB Ard Biesheuvel
     [not found] ` <1412933124-13018-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-10-10 10:33   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2014-10-10 10:37     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-10 14:09       ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-10 14:50         ` Ard Biesheuvel
     [not found]           ` <CAKv+Gu-mP8VqKZQ46JFBrzYq-Xko9h9JYRoghwGjr2mfxA29SQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-10-10 15:21             ` Mark Rutland
     [not found]       ` <CAKv+Gu9b56r3Ujv342xC5CA3_i4yE6ySd=UjUss2U5Yaho0jAQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-10-10 15:55         ` Roy Franz
     [not found]           ` <CAFECyb8pkia6NKETNb-v-5iVZEs66D3Wy5t9DngR4TEa1_Nt6g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-10-10 15:59             ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141010103301.GC4076@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Will.Deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox