Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] x86, kaslr: Use init_size instead of run_size

Borislav Petkov
2015-03-09T20:00:35Z

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 12:35:25PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Can you put back:
> "
> So need to make sure [z_extra_offset, init_size) will fit ZO, that means
> init_size need to be adjusted according to ZO size.
> That make init_size is always >= run_size.

Why?

We don't adjust init_size. We assign INIT_SIZE to it. Or do you want to
say that we indirectly adjust init_size through INIT_SIZE?

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--