From: Matt Fleming <matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Zhang,
Jonathan Zhixiong"
<zjzhang-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
Matt Fleming
<matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
harba-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
linaro-acpi-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] efi: Handle memory error structures produced based on old versions of standard
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 16:54:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150708155440.GA5598@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150630225751.GA18060-E6Nu+q68HHTI/KE9syI0vLvm/XP+8Wra@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, 30 Jun, at 03:57:51PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> The memory error record structure includes as its first field a
> bitmask of which subsequent fields are valid. The allows new fields
> to be added to the structure while keeping compatibility with older
> software that parses these records. This mechanism was used between
> versions 2.2 and 2.3 to add four new fields, growing the size of the
> structure from 73 bytes to 80. But Linux just added all the new
> fields so this test:
> if (gdata->error_data_length >= sizeof(*mem_err))
> cper_print_mem(newpfx, mem_err);
> else
> goto err_section_too_small;
> now make Linux complain about old format records being too short.
>
> Add a definition for the old format of the structure and use that
> for the minimum size check. Pass the actual size to cper_print_mem()
> so it can sanity check the validation_bits field to ensure that if
> a BIOS using the old format sets bits as if it were new, we won't
> access fields beyond the end of the structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> v1-v2: print FW_WARN if we see bogus validation bits from an old sized structure
>
> drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> include/linux/cper.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Looks good to me Tony. Since this is essentially a bug fix, does it need
applying to stable?
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-08 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-23 17:05 compatability with older versions of UEFI Luck, Tony
[not found] ` <20150623170534.GA21341-E6Nu+q68HHTI/KE9syI0vLvm/XP+8Wra@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-24 18:04 ` Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong
[not found] ` <558AF115.8020909-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-24 19:14 ` Luck, Tony
[not found] ` <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F32A9FB7C-8oqHQFITsIE64kNsxIetb7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-24 19:50 ` Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong
[not found] ` <558B09F8.4060706-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-24 20:12 ` Luck, Tony
[not found] ` <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F32A9FBFF-8oqHQFITsIE64kNsxIetb7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-24 23:50 ` Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong
2015-06-28 14:34 ` Matt Fleming
2015-06-28 14:29 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20150628142909.GA28334-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-29 18:21 ` [PATCH] efi: Handle memory error structures produced based on old versions of standard Luck, Tony
[not found] ` <20150629182106.GA25924-E6Nu+q68HHTI/KE9syI0vLvm/XP+8Wra@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-30 12:22 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20150630122244.GJ28334-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-30 22:57 ` [PATCHv2] " Luck, Tony
[not found] ` <20150630225751.GA18060-E6Nu+q68HHTI/KE9syI0vLvm/XP+8Wra@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-08 15:54 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
[not found] ` <20150708155440.GA5598-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-08 17:35 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150708155440.GA5598@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--to=matt-mf/unelci9gs6ibeejttw/xrex20p6io@public.gmane.org \
--cc=harba-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tony.luck-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=zjzhang-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).