From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64/efi: Mapping Boot and Runtime EFI memory regions to different starting virtual address Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:03:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20150730080323.GD8984@nazgul.tnic> References: <1438230757-30840-1-git-send-email-jlee@suse.com> <55B9D806.7030705@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55B9D806.7030705-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" , Matt Fleming Cc: "Lee, Chun-Yi" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "Lee, Chun-Yi" List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:53:42AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > This changelog is at least partially incomprehensive. It also seems > more than a bit aggressive to expect that 1 GB will be sufficient > forever. Right, before we do anything, I'd like for us to figure out first why this is a problem all of a sudden. And why should we even keep boot code/data, if it is fair game, once runtime services get enabled. Matt, can you please chime in first before we even talk about a solution... -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --