From: Matt Fleming <matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Cc: fupan.li-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
fupanli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Luis Henriques
<luis.henriques-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>,
stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 ~ 3.14] efi: fix the efi 32bit boot failed problem
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:45:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150730164544.GL2725@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150730163102.GA19943-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, 30 Jul, at 09:31:02AM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Why isn't this an issue in newer kernel releases? Did this already get
> fixed by some other patch? If so, why can't we just take that patch?
> If not, why not?
The commit 35d5134b7d5a ("x86/efi: Correct EFI boot stub use of
code32_start") only exists in the stable trees in that form because
there was quite a lot of churn in that area in Linus tree that didn't
get backported.
So the code in Linus' tree never looked like the code in the stable does
right now.
> I _REALLY_ don't like taking patches that are not already in Linus's
> tree, as it almost always turns out to be the wrong solution.
Yeah, I think this issue verifies that.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-30 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1438078879-24705-1-git-send-email-fupan.li@windriver.com>
2015-07-30 15:04 ` [PATCH 3.10 ~ 3.14] efi: fix the efi 32bit boot failed problem Matt Fleming
2015-07-30 16:31 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <20150730163102.GA19943-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-30 16:45 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2015-07-30 16:59 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <20150730165943.GD5515-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-31 1:22 ` fupan
2015-07-31 12:05 ` Matt Fleming
2015-07-31 12:21 ` Luis Henriques
2015-08-03 1:38 ` fupan
2015-08-03 2:12 ` fupan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150730164544.GL2725@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--to=matt-mf/unelci9gs6ibeejttw/xrex20p6io@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fupan.li-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fupanli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=luis.henriques-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).