From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] firmware_class: split out transaction helpers Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:43:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20150827194349.GC3596@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <1430348859.2189.37.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1430349052.2189.41.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20150827144727.GB3596@codeblueprint.co.uk> <1440692717.2196.123.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1440692717.2196.123.camel-d9PhHud1JfjCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "Kweh, Hock Leong" , LKML , Andy Lutomirski , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Jones List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Aug, at 09:25:17AM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 15:47 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > > > > (Sorry, I'm coming to this incredibly late) > > > > This patch is pretty neat and I wish something like this had existed > > when I originally wrote the EFI capsule patches. > > > > James, do you have any plans to resubmit this as a non-RFC? If not, do > > you mind if I pick this up and rebase my capsule patches ontop of it? > > Sort of, but I was stalled trying to work out how to combine with your > capsule patches. If you're going to do that work, I can resubmit my > stuff as a patch with all the changes based on the review comments and > then you can do the real work ... Yeah, that sounds great. I'm happy to respin my patches on top. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center