From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ia64: split off early_ioremap() declarations into asm/early_ioremap.h Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:34:55 +0000 Message-ID: <20160113103454.GD25458@arm.com> References: <1452604966-9905-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F39FAC179@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F39FAC179@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: linux-ia64-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Luck, Tony" Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux@roeck-us.net" , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , "matt@codeblueprint.co.uk" , "Yu, Fenghua" List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:33:46PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: > > So create a for ia64, and move the existing > > definitions into it. > > These look OK. > > Acked-by: Tony Luck s/toy/tony/ ;) > Can you put them into the same tree where the pending breakage is sitting? > Then I don't have to worry about coordinating pull requests from the ia64 > tree. The arm trees have already been pulled, so the breakage is in mainline. I think it makes the most sense to fix this either via the ia64 or the efi tree, but I'll queue something at -rc1 if it's still not resolved by then. Will