From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: make checkpatch complain less about efi.h GUID additions. Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:00:37 +0000 Message-ID: <20160126150037.GD7478@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <1453753878-2771-1-git-send-email-pjones@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453753878-2771-1-git-send-email-pjones-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Peter Jones Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 25 Jan, at 03:31:18PM, Peter Jones wrote: > This reformats the GUID definitions in include/linux/efi.h so that if > you add another one with the same style, checkpatch won't complain about > it. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Jones > --- > include/linux/efi.h | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) total: 64 errors, 122 warnings, 1295 lines checked Haha, awesome. Your patch looks good to me, and has the added benefit that the layout more closely resembles how GUIDs are displayed in the UEFI spec. Thanks Peter, applied.