From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] x86/efi: Print size in binary units in efi_print_memmap Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 11:28:29 +0000 Message-ID: <20160203112829.GC2597@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <1454364428-494-1-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> <1454364428-494-15-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> <56B0756E.9010603@redhat.com> <20160203104045.GB7310@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160203104045.GB7310@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Laszlo Ersek , "H . Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Elliott , Andy Shevchenko , Ard Biesheuvel , Taku Izumi , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 03 Feb, at 11:40:45AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > So I kind of agree. Memory is almost never measured in marketing bytes, we should > simply output KB/MB/GB/TB/PB/EB like the rest of the memory management code does > and ignore all the 'i' silliness that infests storage sizes ... Thanks guys. OK, this patch has caused enough headaches. Let's drop it from this series. Robert, Andy, feel free to resubmit it after you've addressed everyone's concerns and we can discuss it in isolation.