From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matt Fleming <matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi/arm64: don't apply MEMBLOCK_NOMAP to UEFI memory map
 mapping
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 11:27:17 +0100
Message-ID: <20160416102717.GX2829@codeblueprint.co.uk>
References: <1459323983-9120-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
 <20160331203520.GB2736@codeblueprint.co.uk>
 <CAPvkgC0Dy1c78LOR53PgyTdDom=fWF9RurJHQ02RuMVj5Pch3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160415221516.GU2829@codeblueprint.co.uk>
 <20160416090910.GA30739@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160416090910.GA30739-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>, Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>, "linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" <linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Mark Salter <msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" <linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 16 Apr, at 11:09:10AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> I just sent it to Linus.
> 
> It got delayed a bit because it had an x86/urgent dependency that had to be sent 
> upstream first. (In the future you can avoid such delays by basing EFI urgent 
> fixes on an upstream -rc kernel, not x86/urgent.)

Noted. I'll do this in future, thanks Ingo.