From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] efi: Introduce *_continue efi_memory_desc iterators Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 21:43:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20160603204311.GN2658@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <1464707672-21882-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> <1464707672-21882-2-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> <20160601103446.GC9280@leverpostej> <20160601104326.GA24749@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20160602143650.GG2658@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20160602162925.GC24938@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <57505F52.3040108@arm.com> <20160602171152.GE24938@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160602171152.GE24938-M2fw3Uu6cmfZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Jeremy Linton , Mark Rutland , linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 02 Jun, at 06:11:52PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > I think you should post them fairly soon so that we get a chance to > review them and ideally push into next around -rc4. > > Regarding these efi/arm64 patches, I can push them to a branch (once the > conflicting efi/urgent patches hit upstream, I guess around -rc2) that > Matt can pull into the EFI tree and I can also pull in the arm64 tree > *if* we are to merge the Jeremy's patches. > > Jeremy, you can base your patches on such branch (I'll follow up with > the details if that's ok with Matt). Sure, this works for me. Thanks Catalin.