* [PATCH] efi: arm64: add debugfs node to dump UEFI runtime page tables
@ 2016-06-30 10:01 Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <1467280906-31158-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2016-06-30 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-efi, catalin.marinas, mark.rutland, matt
Cc: leif.lindholm, Ard Biesheuvel
Register the debugfs node 'efi_page_tables' to allow the UEFI runtime
page tables to be inspected. Note that ARM does not have 'asm/ptdump.h'
[yet] so for now, this is arm64 only.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
---
This patch could be helpful in assessing the series 'arm64: avoid block
entries that we need to split later' that I sent out yesterday.
drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
index 17ccf0a8787a..4197a1da013d 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
@@ -39,6 +39,26 @@ static struct mm_struct efi_mm = {
.mmlist = LIST_HEAD_INIT(efi_mm.mmlist),
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
+#include <asm/ptdump.h>
+
+static struct ptdump_info efi_ptdump_info = {
+ .mm = &efi_mm,
+ .markers = (struct addr_marker[]){
+ { 0, "UEFI runtime start" },
+ { TASK_SIZE_64, "UEFI runtime end" }
+ },
+ .base_addr = 0,
+};
+
+static int __init ptdump_init(void)
+{
+ return ptdump_register(&efi_ptdump_info, "efi_page_tables");
+}
+device_initcall(ptdump_init);
+
+#endif
+
static bool __init efi_virtmap_init(void)
{
efi_memory_desc_t *md;
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread[parent not found: <1467280906-31158-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] efi: arm64: add debugfs node to dump UEFI runtime page tables [not found] ` <1467280906-31158-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> @ 2016-06-30 14:09 ` Mark Rutland 2016-07-01 13:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Mark Rutland @ 2016-06-30 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8, matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io, leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:01:46PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Register the debugfs node 'efi_page_tables' to allow the UEFI runtime > page tables to be inspected. Note that ARM does not have 'asm/ptdump.h' > [yet] so for now, this is arm64 only. > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> > --- > > This patch could be helpful in assessing the series 'arm64: avoid block > entries that we need to split later' that I sent out yesterday. It's probably worth noting that this is based on the arm64 for-next/core branch. I don't know if/how we can orgnise branches for merging this. > drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c > index 17ccf0a8787a..4197a1da013d 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c > @@ -39,6 +39,26 @@ static struct mm_struct efi_mm = { > .mmlist = LIST_HEAD_INIT(efi_mm.mmlist), > }; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64 If you use CONFIG_ARM64_PTDUMP for the moment, then we won't have some unused structs lying around when the feature is unused. Otherwise, I agree that this is a useful debuging feature. FWIW, either way: Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> Thanks, Mark. > +#include <asm/ptdump.h> > + > +static struct ptdump_info efi_ptdump_info = { > + .mm = &efi_mm, > + .markers = (struct addr_marker[]){ > + { 0, "UEFI runtime start" }, > + { TASK_SIZE_64, "UEFI runtime end" } > + }, > + .base_addr = 0, > +}; > + > +static int __init ptdump_init(void) > +{ > + return ptdump_register(&efi_ptdump_info, "efi_page_tables"); > +} > +device_initcall(ptdump_init); > + > +#endif > + > static bool __init efi_virtmap_init(void) > { > efi_memory_desc_t *md; > -- > 2.7.4 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] efi: arm64: add debugfs node to dump UEFI runtime page tables 2016-06-30 14:09 ` Mark Rutland @ 2016-07-01 13:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2016-07-01 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Rutland Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Catalin Marinas, Matt Fleming, Leif Lindholm On 30 June 2016 at 16:09, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:01:46PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> Register the debugfs node 'efi_page_tables' to allow the UEFI runtime >> page tables to be inspected. Note that ARM does not have 'asm/ptdump.h' >> [yet] so for now, this is arm64 only. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> >> --- >> >> This patch could be helpful in assessing the series 'arm64: avoid block >> entries that we need to split later' that I sent out yesterday. > > It's probably worth noting that this is based on the arm64 for-next/core > branch. I don't know if/how we can orgnise branches for merging this. > There's no rush, so Matt can take it for v4.9 I suppose? >> drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c >> index 17ccf0a8787a..4197a1da013d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c >> @@ -39,6 +39,26 @@ static struct mm_struct efi_mm = { >> .mmlist = LIST_HEAD_INIT(efi_mm.mmlist), >> }; >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64 > > If you use CONFIG_ARM64_PTDUMP for the moment, then we won't have some > unused structs lying around when the feature is unused. > I can change that > Otherwise, I agree that this is a useful debuging feature. FWIW, either > way: > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> > Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-01 13:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-30 10:01 [PATCH] efi: arm64: add debugfs node to dump UEFI runtime page tables Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <1467280906-31158-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-30 14:09 ` Mark Rutland
2016-07-01 13:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox