From: Matt Fleming <matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
sylvain.chouleur-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] efi interruptible runtime services
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:58:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160725155820.GD31759@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1468611391-4039-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, 15 Jul, at 09:36:28PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> This is a resend of the generic part of the series 'efi interruptible runtime
> services', of which v3 was sent out on January 13th. I have added an additional
> patch on top which gives runtime-wrappers.c the same treatment as efivars.c,
> i.e., replacing the spinlock with a semaphore.
>
> v2: rebase onto v4.7-rc3
> pr_warn() on failure to acquire the rt services semaphore before invoking
> the reset_system runtime service
> map EFI_ABORTED onto -EINTR
>
> v3: drop lockdep_assert_xxx() calls (#2)
>
> Ard Biesheuvel (1):
> efi: replace runtime services spinlock with semaphore
>
> Sylvain Chouleur (2):
> efi: use a file local lock for efivars
> efi: don't use spinlocks for efi vars
Thanks Ard, applied for v4.9.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-25 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-15 19:36 [PATCH v3 0/3] efi interruptible runtime services Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <1468611391-4039-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-15 19:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] efi: use a file local lock for efivars Ard Biesheuvel
2016-07-15 19:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] efi: don't use spinlocks for efi vars Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <1468611391-4039-3-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-25 15:43 ` Matt Fleming
2016-07-15 19:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] efi: replace runtime services spinlock with semaphore Ard Biesheuvel
2016-07-25 15:58 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-15 19:35 [PATCH v3 0/3] efi interruptible runtime services Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-06 22:33 [PATCH v2 " Sylvain Chouleur
2016-01-13 16:32 ` [PATCH v3 " Sylvain Chouleur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160725155820.GD31759@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--to=matt-mf/unelci9gs6ibeejttw/xrex20p6io@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sylvain.chouleur-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).