From: Matt Fleming <matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
To: Ricardo Neri
<ricardo.neri-calderon-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Peter Jones <pjones-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: delay efi_esrt_init to efi_late_init
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 11:29:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160811102955.GB30909@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470694104-9278-1-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, 08 Aug, at 03:08:24PM, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Commit 7b02d53e7852 introduced a new efi_mem_reserve to reserve the boot
> services memory regions forever. This reservation involves allocating a new
> EFI memory range descriptor. However, allocation can only succeed if there
> is memory available for the allocation. Otherwise, error such as the
> following may occur:
>
> esrt: Reserving ESRT space from 0x000000003dd6a000 to 0x000000003dd6a010.
> Kernel panic - not syncing: ERROR: Failed to allocate 0x9f0 bytes below 0x0.
> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.7.0-rc5+ #503
> 0000000000000000 ffffffff81e03ce0 ffffffff8131dae8 ffffffff81bb6c50
> ffffffff81e03d70 ffffffff81e03d60 ffffffff8111f4df 0000000000000018
> ffffffff81e03d70 ffffffff81e03d08 00000000000009f0 00000000000009f0
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8131dae8>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x65
> [<ffffffff8111f4df>] panic+0xc5/0x206
> [<ffffffff81f7c6d3>] memblock_alloc_base+0x29/0x2e
> [<ffffffff81f7c6e3>] memblock_alloc+0xb/0xd
> [<ffffffff81f6c86d>] efi_arch_mem_reserve+0xbc/0x134
> [<ffffffff81fa3280>] efi_mem_reserve+0x2c/0x31
> [<ffffffff81fa3280>] ? efi_mem_reserve+0x2c/0x31
> [<ffffffff81fa40d3>] efi_esrt_init+0x19e/0x1b4
> [<ffffffff81f6d2dd>] efi_init+0x398/0x44a
> [<ffffffff81f5c782>] setup_arch+0x415/0xc30
> [<ffffffff81f55af1>] start_kernel+0x5b/0x3ef
> [<ffffffff81f55434>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2f/0x31
> [<ffffffff81f55520>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xea/0xed
> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: ERROR: Failed to allocate 0x9f0
> bytes below 0x0.
>
> An inspection of the memblock configuration reveals that there is no memory
> available for the allocation:
>
> MEMBLOCK configuration:
> memory size = 0x0 reserved size = 0x4f339c0
> memory.cnt = 0x1
> memory[0x0] [0x00000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff], 0x0 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0
> reserved.cnt = 0x4
> reserved[0x0] [0x0000000008c000-0x0000000008c9bf], 0x9c0 bytes flags: 0x0
> reserved[0x1] [0x0000000009f000-0x000000000fffff], 0x61000 bytes flags: 0x0
> reserved[0x2] [0x00000002800000-0x0000000394bfff], 0x114c000 bytes flags: 0x0
> reserved[0x3] [0x000000304e4000-0x00000034269fff], 0x3d86000 bytes flags: 0x0
>
> efi_esrt_init is called from efi_init, which in x86 happens before
> memblock_x86_fill is called. Since ESRT is not critical to boot but to
> runtime, its initialization can be safely delayed to efi_late_init.
Ouch. This looks like the right thing to do now that we no longer need
to reserve the ESRT data before efi_reserve_boot_services() runs.
Ard, could you confirm that this isn't does not exist for ARM/arm64?
It looks like reserve_regions() takes care of adding all RAM from the
EFI memmap, so efi_esrt_init() is free to make allocations.
Actually Ricardo, there's a slight hiccup with this patch in that
efi_esrt_init() is now being called at very different points during
boot.
ARM/arm64 call it at efi_init() time and the early_memremap()
calls in the ESRT driver make sense, but those calls don't make sense
when invoked from efi_late_init() on x86. Look how the ACPI BGRT
driver makes use of the standard memremap() API.
Instead, could you fold this call into the same location as
efi_find_mirror() and co. in x86's setup_arch()?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-11 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-08 22:08 [PATCH] x86/efi: delay efi_esrt_init to efi_late_init Ricardo Neri
[not found] ` <1470694104-9278-1-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-11 10:29 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
[not found] ` <20160811102955.GB30909-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-17 0:36 ` Ricardo Neri
2016-08-22 10:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160811102955.GB30909@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--to=matt-mf/unelci9gs6ibeejttw/xrex20p6io@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pjones-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).