From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] efi/arm*: libstub: Invoke EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL to seed the UEFI RNG table Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:23:34 +0000 Message-ID: <20161114132334.GB2373@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <20161112213237.8804-1-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20161112213237.8804-6-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20161113071939.GA31483@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161113071939.GA31483@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "H . Peter Anvin" , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 13 Nov, at 08:19:39AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Matt Fleming wrote: > > > From: Ard Biesheuvel > > > > Invoke the EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL protocol in the context of the stub and > > install the Linux-specific RNG seed UEFI config table. This will be > > picked up by the EFI routines in the core kernel to seed the kernel > > entropy pool. > > > > Cc: Matt Fleming > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel > > This commit (and the commits after this one) doesn't have a proper signoff chain, > probably due to rebasing? Argh, my bad. This is fallout from moving to the co-maintainer model. My scripts assume they don't need to append a SoB because that was handled when applying the patch to the git tree. But that obviously doesn't hold if Ard applies the patch to git, but I mail out the patches as part of the pull request (or vice versa). I guess in future you'd wanna see the SoB of the person mailing the patches, right? > I'll apply the patches from email and add your SOB. Thanks.