From: joeyli <jlee@suse.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <joeyli.kernel@gmail.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-fs@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] MODSIGN: checking the blacklisted hash before loading a kernel module
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:08:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180314060803.GD19718@linux-l9pv.suse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1520961515.5360.19.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:18:35AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 18:38 +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > This patch adds the logic for checking the kernel module's hash
> > base on blacklist. The hash must be generated by sha256 and enrolled
> > to dbx/mokx.
> >
> > For example:
> > sha256sum sample.ko
> > mokutil --mokx --import-hash $HASH_RESULT
> >
> > Whether the signature on ko file is stripped or not, the hash can be
> > compared by kernel.
>
> What's the use case for this? We're already in trouble from the ODMs
> for the size of dbx and its consumption of the extremely limited
> variable space, so do we really have a use case for adding module
> blacklist hashes to the UEFI variables given the space constraints (as
> in one we can't do any other way)?
>
The dbx is a authenticated variable that it can only be updated by
manufacturer. The mokx gives a flexible way for distro to revoke a key
or a signed module. Then we don't need to touch shim or bother
manufacturer to deliver new db. Currently it doesn't have real use
case yet.
I knew that the NVRAM has limited space. But distro needs a backup
solution for emergency.
Thanks a lot!
Joey Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-14 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-13 10:37 [PATCH 0/5 v2] Using the hash in MOKx to blacklist kernel module Lee, Chun-Yi
2018-03-13 10:37 ` [PATCH 1/5] MODSIGN: do not load mok when secure boot disabled Lee, Chun-Yi
2018-03-13 17:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-03-14 10:23 ` joeyli
2018-03-13 10:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] MODSIGN: print appropriate status message when getting UEFI certificates list Lee, Chun-Yi
2018-03-13 10:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] MODSIGN: load blacklist from MOKx Lee, Chun-Yi
2018-03-13 10:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] MODSIGN: checking the blacklisted hash before loading a kernel module Lee, Chun-Yi
2018-03-13 17:18 ` James Bottomley
2018-03-14 6:08 ` joeyli [this message]
2018-03-14 14:19 ` James Bottomley
2018-03-15 6:16 ` joeyli
2018-03-15 14:30 ` James Bottomley
2018-03-16 7:32 ` joeyli
2018-03-13 10:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] MODSIGN: check the attributes of db and mok Lee, Chun-Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180314060803.GD19718@linux-l9pv.suse \
--to=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=joeyli.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=jwboyer@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox