From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
Dave Olsthoorn <dave@bewaar.me>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi: Export boot-services code and data as debugfs-blobs
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 16:10:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180331141030.GB1074@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180331121944.8618-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 02:19:43PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Sometimes it is useful to be able to dump the efi boot-services code and
> data. This commit adds these as debugfs-blobs to /sys/kernel/debug/efi,
> but only if efi=debug is passed on the kernel-commandline as this requires
> not freeing those memory-regions, which costs 20+ MB of RAM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 4 +++
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> index 5b513ccffde4..0f968c7bcfec 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> @@ -374,6 +374,10 @@ void __init efi_free_boot_services(void)
> int num_entries = 0;
> void *new, *new_md;
>
> + /* Keep all regions for /sys/kernel/debug/efi */
> + if (efi_enabled(EFI_DBG))
> + return;
> +
> for_each_efi_memory_desc(md) {
> unsigned long long start = md->phys_addr;
> unsigned long long size = md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> index cd42f66a7c85..fddc5f706fd2 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/kobject.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/efi.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> @@ -316,6 +317,59 @@ static __init int efivar_ssdt_load(void)
> static inline int efivar_ssdt_load(void) { return 0; }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> +
> +#define EFI_DEBUGFS_MAX_BLOBS 32
> +
> +struct debugfs_blob_wrapper debugfs_blob[EFI_DEBUGFS_MAX_BLOBS];
> +
> +static void __init efi_debugfs_init(void)
> +{
> + struct dentry *efi_debugfs;
> + efi_memory_desc_t *md;
> + char name[32];
> + int type_count[EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA + 1] = {};
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + efi_debugfs = debugfs_create_dir("efi", NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(efi_debugfs)) {
> + pr_warn("Could not create efi debugfs entry\n");
> + return;
> + }
{sigh}
No, don't warn, or complain, or do anything else if a debugfs call
fails. Just keep on moving, you can always use the return value
properly in any future call if you need it, and no code flow should ever
care if a debugfs call succeeded or failed.
> /*
> * We register the efi subsystem with the firmware subsystem and the
> * efivars subsystem with the efi subsystem, if the system was booted with
> @@ -360,6 +414,9 @@ static int __init efisubsys_init(void)
> goto err_remove_group;
> }
>
> + if (efi_enabled(EFI_DBG))
> + efi_debugfs_init();
You never remove the directory?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-31 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-31 12:19 [PATCH 1/2] efi: Export boot-services code and data as debugfs-blobs Hans de Goede
2018-03-31 12:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] efi: Add embedded peripheral firmware support Hans de Goede
2018-04-01 0:19 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-01 0:22 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-02 23:23 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2018-04-03 8:33 ` Hans de Goede
2018-04-03 18:07 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-04-03 18:58 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2018-04-04 17:18 ` Peter Jones
2018-04-04 20:25 ` Hans de Goede
2018-04-05 0:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-04-05 5:43 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-04-06 14:08 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2018-04-06 14:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-04-06 14:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-04-07 9:51 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-04-07 11:13 ` Hans de Goede
2018-04-06 14:16 ` Peter Jones
2018-04-03 18:47 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2018-04-05 13:54 ` Hans de Goede
2018-04-03 19:53 ` Peter Jones
2018-04-05 11:51 ` Hans de Goede
2018-03-31 14:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2018-03-31 16:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] efi: Export boot-services code and data as debugfs-blobs Hans de Goede
2018-04-01 0:12 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-01 0:12 ` [RFC PATCH] efi: debugfs_blob[] can be static kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180331141030.GB1074@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=dave@bewaar.me \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox