From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kbuild test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ima: add support for arch specific policies Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 10:24:41 +0800 Message-ID: <201807281011.3IfKWpyx%fengguang.wu@intel.com> References: <20180725233200.761-2-erichte@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180725233200.761-2-erichte@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Richter Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-integrity , linux-security-module , linux-efi , linux-kernel , David Howells , Seth Forshee , Justin Forbes , Nayna Jain , Mimi Zohar List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Hi Nayna, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on integrity/next-integrity] [also build test WARNING on next-20180727] [cannot apply to v4.18-rc6] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Eric-Richter/ima-add-support-for-arch-specific-policies/20180728-072442 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zohar/linux-integrity.git next-integrity reproduce: # apt-get install sparse make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:198:23: sparse: symbol 'arch_policy_rules' was not declared. Should it be static? >> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:199:23: sparse: symbol 'arch_policy_entry' was not declared. Should it be static? include/linux/slab.h:631:13: sparse: undefined identifier '__builtin_mul_overflow' include/linux/slab.h:631:13: sparse: not a function include/linux/slab.h:631:13: sparse: call with no type! Please review and possibly fold the followup patch. --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation