public inbox for linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Prakhya, Sai Praneeth" <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Neri, Ricardo" <ricardo.neri@intel.com>,
	"matt@codeblueprint.co.uk" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	Lee Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>, Al Stone <astone@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/6] x86/efi: Remove __init attribute from memory mapping functions
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 09:12:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180903071207.GA10249@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FFF73D592F13FD46B8700F0A279B802F485B9142@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 05:03:56AM +0000, Prakhya, Sai Praneeth wrote:
> Hmm.. thought that __efi_init might be confusing with the normal __init attribute

How would that be confusing? It has "__efi" prepended?!

All I'm saying is, if you're going to define your own function
attributes, do them generic and short. "_fixup" is too specific IMO. It
also enlarges function definitions unnecessarily.

With "__efi_init" you already denote that it is a special attribute
which has relevance in the EFI code only. What you do about it - the
*fixup* - is the thing you do with the attribute. But you don't have to
have the "what you do" in the attribute name too.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-03  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-02  9:46 [PATCH V2 0/6] Add efi page fault handler to fix/recover from Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2018-09-02  9:46 ` [PATCH V2 1/6] efi: Make efi_rts_work accessible to efi page fault handler Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2018-09-02  9:46 ` [PATCH V2 2/6] x86/efi: Remove __init attribute from memory mapping functions Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2018-09-02 10:56   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-03  5:03     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-09-03  7:12       ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-09-03  8:15         ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-09-02  9:46 ` [PATCH V2 3/6] x86/efi: Permanently save the EFI_MEMORY_MAP passed by the firmware Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2018-09-02  9:46 ` [PATCH V2 4/6] x86/efi: Add efi page fault handler to fixup/recover from page faults caused by firmware Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2018-09-03  8:58   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-03 17:16     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-09-02  9:46 ` [PATCH V2 5/6] x86/mm: If in_atomic(), allocate pages without sleeping Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2018-09-03  8:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-03  8:53     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-03 17:07       ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-09-02  9:46 ` [PATCH V2 6/6] x86/efi: Introduce EFI_WARN_ON_ILLEGAL_ACCESS Sai Praneeth Prakhya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180903071207.GA10249@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=astone@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jlee@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
    --cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox