From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C5CC433EF for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 10:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9759F603E8 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 10:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231730AbhKKKzZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2021 05:55:25 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35274 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229668AbhKKKzZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2021 05:55:25 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ADA7C061766; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 02:52:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id u25so8417389ljo.12; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 02:52:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=iEKA4VskprioZ3wq/U9m+wCXLZ4G97pCcQBnvlOh4Uo=; b=btLkorl9c8K853xVrxR1ADIOhdX23K66lM173VTISdcLAui9Uwt/y1wOtf64uYH2kZ Dfqh0Mnz01q/fHVPSAumedyawbY8zGsiN/ohklkbofF6iyOEsGIEtbyeA5Gwq8kyPC7K 3Ie4wEUiPPjhiE+nr7bjZnLKswnBoKEO1ecaoOyktehx1CpwAgxDIP5AuT0iu0FoAmCw 0BnmH6TUueo4T4bI2DbIHmxBLl0f/0vwYnYNvzJWPCF0LoxzJkAGFcnpBi5OQ/WDEBtA jbKlgVKxeFZlbzmDYcKMQsrlZ+pnWXSFveJITJ2PsdwpND/o6akXMvq+h+syJTulliUn B5SQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=iEKA4VskprioZ3wq/U9m+wCXLZ4G97pCcQBnvlOh4Uo=; b=FC/uEkKedq2HbVduSsYmnaqVQnRRJ3y1qOmaifJ4c2uySutdx2ChCDlk/ddXA1+IV6 y1Y3xEgQUj33LTfWp4HBabxJW15tGxAVwigbQLttpLse953RCBU7lTA4zJjCW7uOKZsG XAWppFjuc53BJlumilM75E+WGGttmtuCXgsg0l+Y6aYhp6G35elKEGCotTxFCsfx13Tu wP47S1veBua8QcYhlntuBdkjIv54whbOStHSwJE9XRMOSXBENjgUp4Swm40n30GrIDLP Uc/ZTcYGn3GWsBSirgqOyERlWqNwPMjlJs396HUQEHTvlGdyWxX/n9zHpnMeqIVhglrn mjdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5313k33fjCfXTTXJHvROCP/ntpfcd0/TDJYjxdk3j48MFELaw8Vc IYABm7T19earApigsvGZ+jk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1IYsvS04cZQ+CvSu8XzvmkMKAcCwl/+9b0JTk3164neupuBhveziHtfju1ysnhZD2DcJ+Dw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:83c6:: with SMTP id s6mr6345880ljh.477.1636627954556; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 02:52:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from lahvuun (93-76-191-141.kha.volia.net. [93.76.191.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l11sm255066lfg.79.2021.11.11.02.52.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Nov 2021 02:52:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 12:52:32 +0200 From: Ilya Trukhanov To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, tzimmermann@suse.de, ardb@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz, dri-devel Subject: Re: [REGRESSION]: drivers/firmware: move x86 Generic System Framebuffers support Message-ID: <20211111105232.apk2msip4ng7hgsw@lahvuun> References: <20211110200253.rfudkt3edbd3nsyj@lahvuun> <627b6cd1-3446-5e55-ea38-5283a186af39@redhat.com> <20211111004539.vd7nl3duciq72hkf@lahvuun> <1ddb9e88-1ef8-9888-113b-fd2a2759f019@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1ddb9e88-1ef8-9888-113b-fd2a2759f019@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 10:24:56AM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On 11/11/21 08:31, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > [snip] > > >>> And for each check /proc/fb, the kernel boot log, and if Suspend-to-RAM works. > >>> > >>> If the explanation above is correct, then I would expect (1) and (2) to work and > >>> (3) to also fail. > >>> > > > > Your testing confirms my assumptions. I'll check how this could be solved to > > prevent the efifb driver to be probed if there's already a framebuffer device. > > > > I've posted [0] which does this and also for the simplefb driver. > > [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20211111092053.1328304-1-javierm@redhat.com/T/#u I applied the patch and it fixes the issue for me. Thank you! > > Best regards, > -- > Javier Martinez Canillas > Linux Engineering > Red Hat >