From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9F3C433F5 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232330AbiBBIph (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 03:45:37 -0500 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([176.126.240.207]:50858 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245230AbiBBIpg (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 03:45:36 -0500 Received: by cavan.codon.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8C04C40A51; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:45:34 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:45:34 +0000 From: Matthew Garrett To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Greg KH , James Bottomley , Dov Murik , linux-efi , Borislav Petkov , Ashish Kalra , Brijesh Singh , Tom Lendacky , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Andi Kleen , Andrew Scull , Dave Hansen , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Lenny Szubowicz , Peter Gonda , Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum , Jim Cadden , Daniele Buono , linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Nayna Jain , dougmill@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gcwilson@linux.ibm.com, gjoyce@ibm.com, "open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , Michael Ellerman , Daniel Axtens Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Allow guest access to EFI confidential computing secret area Message-ID: <20220202084534.GA10247@srcf.ucam.org> References: <37779659ca96ac9c1f11bcc0ac0665895c795b54.camel@linux.ibm.com> <20220202040157.GA8019@srcf.ucam.org> <20220202065443.GA9249@srcf.ucam.org> <20220202071023.GA9489@srcf.ucam.org> <20220202080401.GA9861@srcf.ucam.org> <20220202083653.p3cb4w3qdud4e33t@sirius.home.kraxel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220202083653.p3cb4w3qdud4e33t@sirius.home.kraxel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 09:36:53AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Having a "secrets/" directory looks good to me. Then the individual > implementations can either add files to the directory, i.e. efi_secrets > would create "secrets/" files. Or each implementation creates a > subdirectory with the secrets, i.e. "secrets/coco/" and > "secrets/coco/". I prefer a subdirectory, on the basis that we could conceivably end up with more than one implementation on a single device at some point, and also because it makes it trivial for userland to determine what the source is which may make a semantic difference under certain circumstances. > Longer-term (i.e once we have more than one implementation) we probably > need a separate module which owns and manages the "secrets/" directory, > and possibly provides some common helper functions too. Agree.