From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 572D478C6D; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:05:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732633525; cv=none; b=Hw8UFWH/o7jz0D7Da3zU/4adGb650J6+nEkcxQVyINLo0HSxdYoIVuKDW36FtJjwwExnMbss1SfaAj0o5SwRcR4Rpf2s+sFIAnszDfDuWnCJsyXUyL2WjpBqyIsbnsML6M59gjwxQTWHhzoOdNCSifCkQifueWHifqk7NPs9Wco= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732633525; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Wtj0iHEWSc1uXsdNhe3JmDSAZqsE7SiTrkV+RPD/7qw=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jeyVOz13rH4mcpkwWBo9FH5KjzWhi+lRntaDsccbHeYkDFzMVXh6fyK8gAkCgqkP1K9JEQIFyHRV/9BWggNPQ5PXSzbtVbCLtx9uWTsd3RpyPw1eyjGIefprG8PAbshQw0krwy1qH3MYbm9J6GpLUKNe9ELQL7f46i+CiyE13ig= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XyQmR1FxCz6K8qx; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:02:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D6E41400CB; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:05:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:05:20 +0100 Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:05:19 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Smita Koralahalli CC: , , , Ard Biesheuvel , "Alison Schofield" , Vishal Verma , Ira Weiny , Dan Williams , Yazen Ghannam , "Terry Bowman" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] efi/cper, cxl: Prefix protocol error struct and function names with cxl_ Message-ID: <20241126150519.0000613f@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20241119003915.174386-2-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com> References: <20241119003915.174386-1-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com> <20241119003915.174386-2-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.25) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:39:09 +0000 Smita Koralahalli wrote: > Rename the protocol error struct from struct cper_sec_prot_err to > struct cxl_cper_sec_prot_err and cper_print_prot_err() to > cxl_cper_print_prot_err() to maintain naming consistency. No > functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Smita Koralahalli Hi Smita, Seems sensible to me. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron